IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Asdf] Security considerations -- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-17.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 07 November 2023 08:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FEBC0A8597 for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 00:53:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dJWO_2aS9J9 for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 00:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA46C170610 for <asdf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 00:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:f3bf:4a63:80d:e242]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E19DA20B49 for <asdf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:53:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B060CA1BA3; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:53:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE500A1B57 for <asdf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:53:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: asdf@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <169921738997.33324.7025809789493354028@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <169921738997.33324.7025809789493354028@ietfa.amsl.com>
Comments: In-reply-to internet-drafts@ietf.org message dated "Sun, 05 Nov 2023 12:49:49 -0800."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:53:44 +0100
Message-ID: <3568878.1699347224@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asdf/pLqaOGTs0ixMMM33XWCcJcPDLWo>
Subject: [Asdf] Security considerations -- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-17.txt
X-BeenThere: asdf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A Semantic Description Format \(SDF\) for Things and their Interactions and Data" <asdf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asdf/>
List-Post: <mailto:asdf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 08:53:54 -0000

Security Considerations
  Some wider issues are discussed in [RFC8576].
  (Specifics: TBD.)

Perhaps RFC8576 has some relevant things, and maybe the wider issues
are enough, but in that case, we need to remove the TBD.

Probably we need at least a statement that this describes meta-data not real
protocols, and each actual protocol will have specific protocol related
security, but that this document probably introduces no new security issues.


internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-17


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email