Re: [Asrg] MTX, a distributed DNS whitelist requiring IP and domain ownership

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Wed, 17 February 2010 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D20E3A7AEA for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:30:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qEBdYPuXihB1 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:30:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041173A7472 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:30:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squonk.gsp.org (bltmd-207.114.17.32.dsl.charm.net [207.114.17.32]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o1HCW3vW001441 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:32:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from avatar.gsp.org (avatar.gsp.org [192.168.0.11]) by squonk.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1HCYIHJ007305 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:34:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from avatar.gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9ubuntu1) with ESMTP id o1HCVvH6026139 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:31:57 -0500
Received: (from rsk@localhost) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1HCVvw5026138 for asrg@irtf.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:31:57 -0500
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:31:57 -0500
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <20100217123157.GA26073@gsp.org>
References: <20100215183810.GS27977@chaosreigns.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100215183810.GS27977@chaosreigns.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] MTX, a distributed DNS whitelist requiring IP and domain ownership
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:30:29 -0000

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 01:38:10PM -0500, Darxus@ChaosReigns.com wrote:
> I believe the more this is adopted, the more spammers will be required to
> own the transmitting IP *and* a throwaway domain.  And I think if we pin
> them down that far, ability to focus on the throwaway domains and IPs
> used with MTX will make those problems more manageable.  

This belief is incongruent with reality.  Spammers have an unlimited
supply of throwaway domains.

If you're trying to attack the spam-from-zombies problem, superior
approaches exist and have already proven themselves in production.

---Rsk