IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Do we agree that draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-08 is done?

TRBL Support <trblhelp@gmail.com> Mon, 18 April 2011 02:15 UTC

Return-Path: <trblhelp@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5024E075A for <asrg@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6NV7ri9qiKCe for <asrg@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FCBE066C for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vxc34 with SMTP id 34so4149034vxc.13 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=460brNjsHL/F+NO5fWUVVroSXkGsmA3E/02Bs5ZB46E=; b=RKGARBzGOKIzWgyoSN51PRFRntAFQHWpwNrNH5UT3ouo9bquSy6n9QQQo25AVurt6M gtQZQar99c2x5/Icbdmu8OaA5qcEwXaihVguKEiXJmEUnCRithQxwO7LstzHerUlPsqu 8EUrcpVgboRbVm61XJwokAy9+kx59C8tLa51A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AnrcXMqlu+xv/9erTcPNTtbeeXefygSmUY5Txz9WA0rud7NoKr4gXl9R6YZMX/xjwt 4DIPyUcxa9hs5Tlp0eSPDPQFdG+EMhDe9o9WdIIRSINmTugy8maTJdU9yKm5bvj06nop X98YlHfM2h+lIA+jwK/sKgBcjDRGjWLzMsQhs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.122.39 with SMTP id j39mr1373958vcr.78.1303092903124; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.100.8 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110417174150.65016.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <20110417174150.65016.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:15:03 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTinMhZ1-s2=TN6y7WRHwHErB=BG43A@mail.gmail.com>
From: TRBL Support <trblhelp@gmail.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Do we agree that draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-08 is done?
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 02:15:04 -0000

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 12:41 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> It's been a while since we've seen any traffic about the BCP-ish
> draft.
>
> Barring strenuous objection, I'll say that we have RG consensus
> to publish it.

No objection here.

Rs,
Tom @ TRBL
-- 
Tom @ TRBLSPAM DNSBL: http://www.trblspam.com
simple, spamtrap driven, easy on, easy off

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email