Re: [Asrg] Call for contributors to develop `pay per fraudulantmessage` I-D, code

Amir Herzberg <herzbea@cs.biu.ac.il> Wed, 29 December 2004 14:23 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA11232 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:23:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cjeuj-0008F5-Jt for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:35:01 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CjegK-0004OZ-2v; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:20:08 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cjeen-00045M-40 for asrg@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:18:33 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA10565 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:18:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ismss-1.biu.ac.il ([132.70.46.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cjepu-00084L-O0 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:30:03 -0500
Received: from [132.70.4.39] ([132.70.4.39]) by ismss-1.biu.ac.il with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:18:38 +0200
Message-ID: <41D2BCB0.2090105@cs.biu.ac.il>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:18:24 +0200
From: Amir Herzberg <herzbea@cs.biu.ac.il>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Lambert <PaulLambert@AirgoNetworks.Com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Call for contributors to develop `pay per fraudulantmessage` I-D, code
References: <3FFBC907DD03A34CA4410C5C745DEB1205144966@wnimail.WoodsideNet.Co m>
In-Reply-To: <3FFBC907DD03A34CA4410C5C745DEB1205144966@wnimail.WoodsideNet.C o m>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-imss-version: 2.7
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:19 M:0 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:2 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.1500 0.1500)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: asrg@ietf.org, Amir Herzberg <herzbea@macs.biu.ac.il>, Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3e15cc4fdc61d7bce84032741d11c8e5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Paul Lambert wrote:

>>idea that someone has to decide what is spam and what is not. 
> 
> No ... spam is subjective.  Formaly deciding what is or is not spam
> is the wrong way to proceed.
> 
> Instead, consider what happens if all mail is 'tagged'.  Filtering
> becomes
> a more reliable mechanism since there would be standard recoginzable
> tags.
Exactly! Plus: tagged in an enforceable manner (based on trust between 
individuals and/or organizations, or based on penalties mechanism). 
That's exactly the goal of SICS.

> Filtering could be based on whatever a user or provider chose to use as
> a tagging criteria.  
I think some universal tags would also be useful.

> The filtering criteria would of course include some
> the measure of the trust in the tag's creator. 
If such trust exists. If not (and we do want e-mail to remain open), it 
could include a `bond`  or `guaranteed payment certificate`, by some 
trusted `guaranteed payment certificate authority`, which can be 
redeemed if the tag is misleading. Again: part of SICS design.

...skip...
> Now this just requires:
>  - determination of existing fileds that might be used for filtering
>  - definition of new tags
>  - meta language for tag syntax and semantic definition
>  - digital signature formats and procedures to provide
>    authenticity and traceability of tagging
>  - tag creation and key distribution procedures
>    (perhaps including the exchange of money)
> 
> The above ideas are based partialy on the PICS effort.
Correct. Which is why I coined the name SICS (`Secure Internet Content 
Selection`).
...
> That would significantly help solve spam, and mail spoofing problems.
I agree!
> 
> Note, I am not a proponent of fee based solutions, but services will
In principle, neither am I. But here users pay only if they - or their 
machine - sends message with misleading tags. I think this is Ok - at 
least compared to alternatives...

Best, Amir Herzberg
http://AmirHerzberg.com

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg