Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de> Fri, 09 May 2003 08:00 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA08522 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2003 04:00:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h498Aid13251 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 9 May 2003 04:10:44 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h498Ai813248 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2003 04:10:44 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA08508; Fri, 9 May 2003 04:00:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19E2pl-0002SH-00; Fri, 09 May 2003 04:02:25 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19E2pk-0002SE-00; Fri, 09 May 2003 04:02:24 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h49894813179; Fri, 9 May 2003 04:09:04 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4987T812623 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2003 04:07:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA08421 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2003 03:57:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19E2mc-0002RC-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 May 2003 03:59:10 -0400
Received: from sklave3.rackland.de ([213.133.101.23]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19E2mb-0002R9-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 May 2003 03:59:09 -0400
Received: from sodom (uucp@localhost) by sklave3.rackland.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-1) with BSMTP id h49805O7014108 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 9 May 2003 10:00:05 +0200
Received: (from hadmut@localhost) by sodom.home.danisch.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-1) id h497w7Sp002350 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 9 May 2003 09:58:07 +0200
From: Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
Message-ID: <20030509075807.GA2101@danisch.de>
References: <200305081719.h48HJsVT029163@calcite.rhyolite.com> <20030508174700.8B5BB1394B@sa.vix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030508174700.8B5BB1394B@sa.vix.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 09:58:07 +0200
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 05:47:00PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote: > Repudiating MAIL FROM > > Status of this Memo This is in principle the same approach as RMX, but a different implementation. (i.e. it lists the IP addresses of machines authorized to deliver in DNS, it differs in the way those addresses are stored). It is very astonishing that it is Vernon who brings that proposal. Concerning Vernon's objections against RMX, there is no difference between RMX and this proposal. So why should those objections apply on RMX, but not on that proposal? The effect that use of a certain domain as a sender address will be limited to some IP addresses as well. It will require DNS queries as well. It will require hotmail, yahoo, aol users to deliver through the hotmail/yahoo/aol relays as well. So what's the point in quoting that proposal in context of the objections against RMX? The advantage of Paul Vixie's proposal is, that it doesn't require a new DNS RR type. The disadvantage is, that it is error prone and takes a high overhead: There are providers who provide services for 20..2,000,000 domains. Since in this proposal the domain zone tables must list every single mail relay, all zone tables must be updated if the provider installs an additional relay. If the provider does have access to the zone tables, this is just a heap of work. If the provider does not have access to the zone tables, then it is a severe overhead and delay to inform all the domain owners and ask them to update their tables. When writing your domain table, you need a detailed list of the relays your provider has. At least you need to know the number of relays. In reality, it would certainly look like this: .. MX relay0.provider.com relay1.provider.com relay2.provider.com But you will always have to update the list if the provider uses one more relay than you have listed. That's why RMX uses an indirection step through the provider's APL records. It's a design criterion to avoid this overhead and delay. Hadmut _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix… Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Mark Delany
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Brad Templeton
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Mark Delany
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Brad Templeton
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Nate W
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Nate W
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Nate W
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Nate W
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… David Jameson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… wayne
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Nate W
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Troy Rollo
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Nate W
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Troy Rollo
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… David Jameson
- RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Eric S. Johansson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Steve Schear
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS f… Russell-2asrg44all-
- Re: [Asrg] Re: draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-01.txt Justin Mason
- [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation Paul Vixie
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… David Walker
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… J C Lawrence
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… william
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… Mike Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… David Walker
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… David Walker
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… william
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… Alan DeKok
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… william
- [Asrg] List Detection Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's proc… Tom Thomson
- Re: [Asrg] List Detection Matt Sergeant
- RE: [Asrg] List Detection Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation Tom Thomson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… David Jameson
- Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's… mathew