IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Greylisting BCP

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Mon, 24 October 2011 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE9321F8E3D for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.105, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ahgADny2HRru for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9CD21F8DD9 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:34:12 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:34:10 -0700
Thread-Topic: Greylisting BCP
Thread-Index: AcyNyFMiwGiS2GCfTAOjHwpIcL/KzAEkYibA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14C4C@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14AC6@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14AC6@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14C4CEXCHC2corpclo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Greylisting BCP
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:34:13 -0000

Thanks to all for the feedback so far.  I've updated the draft to fold in the points people raised.  I'll start the work of actually adding text to the various sections after the next IETF meeting.

If any of you have specific text you'd like to see in there, please do send it along.

From: asrg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:asrg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 12:01 PM
To: asrg@irtf.org
Subject: [Asrg] Greylisting BCP

After some chatter inside MAAWG and on the ietf-smtp mailing list, I've started an outline for a BCP on the practice of greylisting.  The main purpose is to explain what it is, discuss the pros and cons of its variants, and give some recommendations for implementation and configuration for a few example installations and policies.

The draft (which is currently only an outline) is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp/

Comments welcome.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email