IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Challenge/response - CRI

david nicol <whatever@davidnicol.com> Thu, 28 August 2003 10:53 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA29267 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:53:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19sJrJ-0004p4-CS for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:18:29 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h7SAITBN018534 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:18:29 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19sFKT-0004ag-Na for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:28:17 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA19395; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:28:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19sFKP-0003YS-00; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:28:13 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19sFKP-0003YP-00; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:28:13 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19sDnR-0008Da-PG; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 23:50:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19sB0i-0002yN-Si for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 20:51:37 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA24330 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 20:51:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19sB0g-0004WK-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 20:51:34 -0400
Received: from ms-smtp-02.rdc-kc.rr.com ([24.94.166.122]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19sB0f-0004WA-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 20:51:33 -0400
Received: from CPE-24-163-156-200.kc.rr.com (CPE-24-163-156-200.kc.rr.com [24.163.156.200]) by ms-smtp-02.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h7S0pRsN029491; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:51:27 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Challenge/response - CRI
From: david nicol <whatever@davidnicol.com>
To: Eric Dean <eric@purespeed.com>
Cc: "'Deven T. Corzine'" <deven@ties.org>, 'Yakov Shafranovich' <research@solidmatrix.com>, 'Andrew Akehurst' <A.D.Akehurst-99@student.lboro.ac.uk>, asrg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <00a201c367f4$2cc33e60$0a01a8c0@sohonotebook>
References: <00a201c367f4$2cc33e60$0a01a8c0@sohonotebook>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1062031886.5624.128.camel@plaza.davidnicol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:51:26 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In the terms of my quoted message, listing a method or methods in the
protocol would constitute approval.

Don't want to get bogged down in the morass of "violent agreement."

Cheers


On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 09:54, Eric Dean wrote:
> I'm not sure that we have to approve anything...we just have to have a
> protocol provide capabilities for interoperability..we don't have to
> select a method..but rather design a protocol that will accommodate.

 
> > I imagine one would hash all the MIME parts together.  Or do whatever
> > GPG does with a MIME message.  This but has been solved, there is only
> > to select an approach and approve it.

-- 
David Nicol / If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger hammer. 
                                        http://gallaghersmash.com


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email