[Asrg] 3.bc - Microbonds and bonds in general

"william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net> Tue, 18 May 2004 06:47 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA18600 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:47:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BPyHf-0001WF-Qd for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:41:04 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i4I6f3oE005829 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:41:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BPyA5-0008IR-VA for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:33:13 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA17878 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:33:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BPyA2-0006EY-7n for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:33:10 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BPy8z-0005pa-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:32:06 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BPy89-0005PG-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:31:13 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BPy2M-0006PA-Pz; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:25:14 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BPy00-0004qP-Ux for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:22:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA17065 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:22:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BPxzx-000223-B3 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:22:45 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BPxyu-0001d6-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:21:40 -0400
Received: from sokol.elan.net ([216.151.192.200]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BPxxm-0000rw-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 02:20:30 -0400
Received: from sokol.elan.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sokol.elan.net (8.12.11/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i4I7cIl2006067 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 00:38:18 -0700
Received: from localhost (william@localhost) by sokol.elan.net (8.12.11/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id i4I7cHc4006064 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 00:38:17 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: sokol.elan.net: william owned process doing -bs
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405180027500.30536-100000@sokol.elan.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: [Asrg] 3.bc - Microbonds and bonds in general
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 00:38:17 -0700
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

The following was just posted to spf, but since that group is not focused
on spam technologies in general, it might be more usefull and productive 
if discussions about this concept happen here. I note that what is proposed
is kind of a merger of bondedsender and similar whitelists with micropayments
(or similar) system of confirmation of that whitelisting.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 00:20:39 -0400
From: Meng Weng Wong <mengwong@dumbo.pobox.com>
Reply-To: spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com
To: spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] regarding hashcash / penny black and vanquish

On a related note regarding the sender-pays concept, I was recently
approached by www.vanquish.com.  The concept is similar to Yahoo
DomainKeys --- ISP-level cryptographic signatures embedded invisibly
in the message --- but adds an interesting twist: along with the
signature you get a microbond.

Not a micropayment, where each delivery always represents a financial
transaction; more like a microbet, where each delivery is underwritten
by a willingness to pay.  Essentially, senders say "I bet you 1 cent
that my message won't waste your time."  If the message is legit, the
recipient doesn't collect.  Only if it's spam does the recipient make
the sender pay.  I think this model accurately reflects real-world
economics.

Their business challenge is twofold: getting their zero-value bond (in
signature only mode) out into the market before Yahoo DomainKeys hits
the bigtime, and finding the industry niche who actually do want to
make use of this concept.

The great thing about sender authentication is that once it's in
place, you can start augmenting the email landscape in all kinds of
interesting ways like this one.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-200405.txtsc
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg