RE: [Asrg] mail metering, was Spam, defined, and permissions

"Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com> Wed, 29 December 2004 06:11 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA09992 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:11:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjXEb-0004Ij-78 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:23:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CjWzD-0006bn-T5; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:07:07 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CjWs2-00053u-Aw for asrg@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:59:42 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA09113 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:59:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from falcon.verisign.com ([216.168.239.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjX34-0003zA-R9 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:11:08 -0500
Received: from VSVAPOSTALGW1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (vsvapostalgw1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.170.12.38]) by falcon.verisign.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBT5sfop018923; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:54:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: by vsvapostalgw1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <Y05Q5L3K>; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:59:01 -0500
Message-ID: <A206819EF47CBE4F84B5CB4A303CEB7A14A419@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>
To: 'Barry Shein' <bzs@world.std.com>
Subject: RE: [Asrg] mail metering, was Spam, defined, and permissions
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:58:41 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc: asrg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Shein [mailto:bzs@world.std.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:17 AM
> To: Hannigan, Martin
> Cc: bzs@world.std.com; asrg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Asrg] mail metering, was Spam, defined, and permissions
> 
> 
> 
> On December 28, 2004 at 21:54 hannigan@verisign.com 
> (Hannigan, Martin) wrote:
>  > 
>  > The only people evading would be spammers.
> 
> That's probably true if the amount of mail included, like 1,000/mo,
> was pretty reasonable, it's not really comparable to IP piracy where
> every item has value.

I'm thinking that every item does have value since every bit is billable
at a higher level in the network and the possibility that the billing
schemes have simply not matured is real.

-M<


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg