[Asrg] Re: Spam send/receive ratio

Jim Witte <jswitte@bloomington.in.us> Wed, 19 May 2004 22:44 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA26027 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:44:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQZes-0004Wr-Vf for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:35:30 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i4JMZUOE017410 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:35:30 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQZYm-0002hg-FZ for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:29:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA25207 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:29:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQZYh-0003TY-0Q for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:29:07 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQZXm-0003NA-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:28:10 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQZWp-0003Gw-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:27:11 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQZK9-0004k4-0T; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:14:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQZDQ-0008Mc-Le for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:07:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA23418 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:07:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQZDN-00013p-R7 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:07:05 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQZCQ-0000wY-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:06:07 -0400
Received: from rockridge.uits.indiana.edu ([129.79.1.74]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQZBm-0000ql-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 18:05:26 -0400
Received: from fontz.uits.indiana.edu (fontz.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.76]) by rockridge.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/IUPO) with ESMTP id i4JM5ObV015070 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:05:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.2.2] (dial-64-151-128-64.bton.kiva.net [64.151.128.64]) (authenticated bits=0) by fontz.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/IUPO) with ESMTP id i4JM5CSQ021853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:05:22 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613)
In-Reply-To: <20040519182510.5840.8742.Mailman@www1.ietf.org>
References: <20040519182510.5840.8742.Mailman@www1.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <459BEE9A-A9D5-11D8-88D5-000393DC31DA@bloomington.in.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Witte <jswitte@bloomington.in.us>
To: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Asrg] Re: Spam send/receive ratio
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 15:44:06 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> One of the distinguishing characteristics of a spammer is the
> imbalance between mail sent and mail received.  Unfortunately I do not
> see a convenient way to penalize people who fall into this category.

   One idea about this (although I don't know how scalable it is) would 
be, if you could authenticate the sender ie DomainKeys or the like, 
then every sender would have a send/receive ratio (somewhere), which 
would be entered into the mail header in some way that it could not be 
spoofed (more protocol changes though).  Then if a mail is received by 
the end-user's inbox, it could check the ratio, and decide whether to 
accept/reject/quarantine it.

   But I sill don't see a way to penalize senders who are rejected too 
often.  Although perhaps it could be integrated into the 'delay' in 
creating the email-stamp/introduction-stamp (the more higher your 
send/receive ratio goes, the more it "costs" to send new stuff)  
Another possibility is of course law enforecement, but this would seem 
to require some centralization of the ratio information, and whose 
rejecting what.

   The send/receive ratio might also be a problem for mailing lists - 
maybe, I'd have to see statistics.

Jim


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg