IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium

Kee Hinckley <nazgul@somewhere.com> Mon, 05 May 2003 13:37 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA01449 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 09:37:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h45DjCe02085 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 5 May 2003 09:45:12 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h45DjB802082 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 09:45:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA01435; Mon, 5 May 2003 09:36:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19CgB5-0005mR-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 09:38:47 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19CgB5-0005mO-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 09:38:47 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h45Dfx801801; Mon, 5 May 2003 09:41:59 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h450X7809643 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2003 20:33:07 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA09651 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2003 20:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19CTop-0002tj-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 04 May 2003 20:26:59 -0400
Received: from www.somewhere.com ([66.92.72.194] helo=somewhere.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19CTok-0002tY-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 04 May 2003 20:26:54 -0400
Received: from [66.92.72.194] (account nazgul HELO [192.168.1.104]) by somewhere.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 2313803; Sun, 04 May 2003 19:27:17 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: nazgul@somewhere.com@pop.messagefire.com
Message-Id: <p06000f11badb4e33d9a3@[192.168.1.104]>
In-Reply-To: <01C3123A.567F1CC0.eric@infobro.com>
References: <01C3123A.567F1CC0.eric@infobro.com>
To: "Eric D. Williams" <eric@infobro.com>
From: Kee Hinckley <nazgul@somewhere.com>
Subject: RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium
Cc: asrg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 19:10:36 -0400

At 12:39 PM -0400 5/4/03, Eric D. Williams wrote:
>no protocol interaction.  There are some I suspect who would argue that all
>'spaminess' must be detected in the SMTP transactions (and that has 
>advantages)

Given that two different people may consider the same list to be, or 
not be, spam.  And that it is not always possible to determine the 
final recipient at the SMTP transaction point, I think it's pretty 
clear that this isn't possible.
-- 
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/          Junk-Free Email Filtering
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/   Writings on Technology and Society

I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email