RE: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> Thu, 08 May 2003 01:23 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA26488 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2003 21:23:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h481X2e13021 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 7 May 2003 21:33:02 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h481X2813018 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2003 21:33:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA26440; Wed, 7 May 2003 21:23:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Da9y-0006nr-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 21:25:22 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Da9x-0006no-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 21:25:21 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h481VC812778; Wed, 7 May 2003 21:31:12 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h47KLk819120 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2003 16:21:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA15916 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2003 16:12:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DVIq-0004MH-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 07 May 2003 16:14:12 -0400
Received: from peacock.verisign.com ([65.205.251.73]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DVIp-0004ME-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 07 May 2003 16:14:11 -0400
Received: from mou1wnexc02.verisign.com (verisign.com [65.205.251.54]) by peacock.verisign.com (8.12.9/) with ESMTP id h47KF1dv028599; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mou1wnexc02.verisign.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <K1JBVDMC>; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:15:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CE541259607DE94CA2A23816FB49F4A301AE2454@vhqpostal6.verisign.com>
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
To: 'J C Lawrence' <claw@kanga.nu>, Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org>
Cc: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article )
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 13:14:59 -0700
> Should the holder of the DNS keys be a dictator over all the mail sent > from his domain? You say, "Yes!" I say, "Hell no!" Domain names are not a scarce resource. The only way that you can in the long term protect your identity in cyberspace is to control your own domain. The domain name owner can decide what mail you receive. I see no reason why control over what is sent is an ideological issue. I much prefer the concept that everyone is master of their own domain than we have to submit to the predjudices of whoever the self appointed censor of the week would be. Phill _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Reinhold Jordan
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Roland
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Reinhold Jordan
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Reinhold Jordan
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Reinhold Jordan
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Jens Reichmann
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Daniel Feenberg
- [Asrg] RMX Records -- waterproof? Johan Louwers
- [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Gary Feldman
- [Asrg] What is Spam? Was: RMX Records Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records Florian Weimer
- Re: [Asrg] RMX Records -- waterproof? Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] What is Spam? Was: RMX Records Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution Mark Delany
- Re: [Asrg] RMX Records -- waterproof? Johan Louwers
- Re: [Asrg] solution space (was Re: Textual Analys… william
- [Asrg] solution space (was Re: Textual Analysis i… Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution Mark Delany
- [Asrg] Single-User Addresses (a bit piece of a so… Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] What is Spam? Was: RMX Records Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] What is Spam? Was: RMX Records Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] solution space (was Re: Textual Analys… Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution Mark Delany
- Re: [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution Roland
- Re: [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do… Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] Quotation Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] Quotation Kee Hinckley
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… J C Lawrence
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Michael Rubel
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… J C Lawrence
- RE: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Michael Rubel
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Hadmut Danisch
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… J C Lawrence
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… J C Lawrence
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Hadmut Danisch
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… J C Lawrence
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Markus Stumpf
- RE: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Eric D. Williams
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Mike Rubel
- Re: Consent (was Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on n… Markus Stumpf
- [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX Michael Rubel
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX Tom Thomson