Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Wed, 05 March 2003 15:15 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA04143 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:15:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h25FQb102039 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:26:37 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h25FQa502036 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:26:36 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA04106; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:15:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h25FP2501976; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:25:02 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h25FOf501946 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:24:41 -0500
Received: from astro.cs.utk.edu (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA03809 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:13:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from astro.cs.utk.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astro.cs.utk.edu (cf 8.9.3) with SMTP id h25FFBA00936; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:15:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: "David F. Skoll" <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>
Cc: moore@cs.utk.edu, asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal
Message-Id: <20030305101511.462675e7.moore@cs.utk.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303051006430.2189@shishi.roaringpenguin.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303050901390.2189@shishi.roaringpenguin.com> <20030305090933.130ffaac.moore@cs.utk.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303050925440.2189@shishi.roaringpenguin.com> <20030305100529.4cfd97ad.moore@cs.utk.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303051006430.2189@shishi.roaringpenguin.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--netbsdelf)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:15:11 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> > none that are reliable and can be determined by looking at just the
> > message.
> 
> Right.  Are you sure you read my proposal? 

I assure you that I haven't read every proposal, or yours specifically.
there have been too many messages and documents to keep up with.

> If you can be an
> omniscient being and see what happens to every message sent in a
> bulk-email run, I believe you will see a difference between spamming
> and legitimate bulk e-mailing.  

only if you can keep track of the complaints that the message produces. 
I don't think it's reasonable to judge 'legitimacy' of a message based
on what happens before delivery.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg