Re: [Asrg] Existing practice with IMAP junk/nonjunk flag
Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Tue, 09 March 2010 12:36 UTC
Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F233A67E3 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 04:36:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JXJoP7kyHN2l for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 04:36:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (www.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D94F3A67CC for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 04:36:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tana.it; s=test; t=1268138202; bh=/M0VDmaZf2Wl5io2WrKTM5WFCkLXQNysb88thIr1wPg=; l=377; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DJU6Xrkl7p/dFh88/l2BUp8wqihZ0LhnHL6r1y6KekV9PlMSFlaL3Od1pyHmiGk6A iJr46ZSFUBY5vhBSglTjzu6uR9bu7aVzPryM0TdsgQrqP8+HsGO4X6zQpQ92r3SnEW NKoL33SvknLJ8i+uU7pTBqW2m5+/dDNTKR10vRZ8=
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 515, TLS: TLS1.0,256bits,RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:36:42 +0100 id 00000000005DC02F.000000004B9640DA.00003FDD
Message-ID: <4B9640DA.9050801@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:36:42 +0100
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <20100309060851.49697.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100309060851.49697.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Existing practice with IMAP junk/nonjunk flag
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:36:49 -0000
On 09/Mar/10 07:08, John Levine wrote: > Thunderbird adds a flag called Junk to a message if it's flagged as junk, and a flag called NonJunk to a message that has the junk indicator subsequently turned off. The flag can also be set by the server on delivery, to prevent TB from filtering specific messages (since filtering can only be en/dis-abled on a global basis.)
- [Asrg] Existing practice with IMAP junk/nonjunk f… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Existing practice with IMAP junk/nonju… Alessandro Vesely