IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ipv6nd-02.txt & autoconfig

Grenville Armitage <gja@bellcore.com> Thu, 09 May 1996 21:16 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24550; 9 May 96 17:16 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24546; 9 May 96 17:16 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15599; 9 May 96 17:16 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA19227; Thu, 9 May 1996 17:09:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA13853 for ip-atm-out; Thu, 9 May 1996 17:03:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA13844 for <ip-atm@nexen.com>; Thu, 9 May 1996 17:03:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com (thumper.bellcore.com [128.96.41.1]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA19155 for <ip-atm@nexen.com>; Thu, 9 May 1996 17:03:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from thumper (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumper.bellcore.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id QAA02383; Thu, 9 May 1996 16:25:51 -0400
Message-Id: <199605092025.QAA02383@thumper.bellcore.com>
To: schulter@zk3.dec.com
cc: Grenville Armitage <gja@bellcore.com>, ip-atm@nexen.com
Subject: Re: ipv6nd-02.txt & autoconfig
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 09 May 1996 15:44:32 -0400. <9605091944.AA10915@dogfish.zk3.dec.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 16:25:35 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Grenville Armitage <gja@bellcore.com>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ip-atm@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to ip-atm@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to majordomo@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives via http://cell-relay.indiana.edu/cell-relay/archives/IPATM/IPATM.html

Pete,

>>While I don't think that the use of the SEL should be restricted as Bert
>>has suggested, the ATM switch already has to be able to keep track of 
>>multiple ESIs per endsystem.

I am aware that they can and do.

>>However, not
>>using the SEL byte does reduce the potential number of ATM services
>>that can be addressed on an end system by a factor of 256.

exactly.

gja

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email