RE: IETF WG charter needed for NEWDOM
Eugene Kashpureff <ekashp@mrls.com> Sun, 21 July 1996 00:32 UTC
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09151; 20 Jul 96 20:32 EDT
Received: from ietf.org by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12942; 20 Jul 96 20:32 EDT
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa27195; 20 Jul 96 20:32 EDT
Received: from alex.mrls.com by ietf.org id aa27128; 20 Jul 96 20:29 EDT
Received: (from ekashp@localhost) by alex.mrls.com (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA03167; Sat, 20 Jul 1996 17:28:32 -0700
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 17:28:32 -0700
Sender: ietf-request@ietf.org
From: Eugene Kashpureff <ekashp@mrls.com>
To: Jim Browning <jfbb@atmnet.net>
cc: 'Michael Dillon' <michael@memra.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "newdom@iiia.org" <newdom@iiia.org>
Subject: RE: IETF WG charter needed for NEWDOM
In-Reply-To: <01BB7659.B0D470A0@jfbb.atmnet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960720172531.3163A-100000@alex.mrls.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
On Sat, 20 Jul 1996, Jim Browning wrote: > >there is no good reason why we cannot fulfill the open WG style procedures > >right here in NEWDOM. > be formed, only that this one focus on refining IANA's draft (preferably > with WG recognition), which I suspect will at some point be submitted to > the IESG with a request to give it RFC/BCP status. All in favour say Aye ! A Y E ! > Jim Browning At your name service, Eugene Kashpureff, ALTERNIC.NET
- RE: IETF WG charter needed for NEWDOM Eugene Kashpureff