Re: [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks!
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 01 June 2010 15:38 UTC
Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D35F28C165 for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.966
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.966 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.317, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P0W2IWRWub0h for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail5.alcatel.fr (smail5.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF13528C156 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.61]) by smail5.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id o51FcLbo014338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:38:38 +0200
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.47]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.61]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:38:25 +0200
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, "earlywarning@ietf.org" <earlywarning@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:38:24 +0200
Thread-Topic: [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks!
Thread-Index: AcsBBiHYNfwSxI7CSkG0hpMx3XNR1wAmZwWA
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE213C6C964@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <20100531211316.310600@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100531211316.310600@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.13
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks!
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:38:55 -0000
Firstly a question: What does "initial" mean in the milestones? Secondly can you put some dates in the milestones, even if they are things like "Charter date plus 9 months". I at least need to understand the proposed document sequence. I assume the approved milestones will not contain text such as: "A starting point for this work is draft-rosen-ecrit-lost-early-warning." so can you move this text to some sort of editorial gloss at the end - which will not appear in the final charter. regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig > Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:13 PM > To: earlywarning@ietf.org > Subject: [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks! > > Thank you all for participating in this charter discussion. I > plan to submit the following charter text to the RAI ADs > within the next 24 hours. I included a few minor wording > changes based on the very recent feedback on the list. > > Brian D., James P. + Martin T.: Please browse through the > text to see whether you are happy with it. > > Ciao > Hannes > > ---------------------------------------------- > > > Authority to Citizen Alert (ATOCA) > ================================== > > There are a variety of mechanisms that authorities have > available to notify citizens and visitors during emergency > events. Traditionally, theyhave done so with broadcast > networks (radio and television). For commercial mobile > devices, broadcasting services such as the Public Warning > System (PWS), the Earthquake and Tsunami Warning System > (ETWS), and the Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS) are > standardized and are in various stages of deployment. The > Internet provides another way for authority-to-citizen alerts > to be sent, but it also presents new challenges. While there > are some existing layer 2 mechanisms for delivering alerts, > the work in this group focuses on delivering alerts to IP > endpoints only. > > The general message pattern that this group is intended to > address is the sending of alerts from a set of pre-authorized > agents (e.g., governmental agencies) to a large population > without impacting layer 2 networks (e.g. causing congestion > or denial of service). > > The goal of this group is not to specify how originators of > alerts obtain authorization, but rather how an ATOCA system > can verify authorization and deliver messages to the intended > recipients. A critical element of the work are the mechanisms > that assure that onlythose pre-authorized agents can send > alerts via ATOCA, through an interface to authorized alert > distribution networks (e.g., iPAWS/DM-Open in the U.S.). > > The ATOCA effort is differentiated from and is not intended > to replace other alerting mechanisms (e.g., PWS, CMAS, ETWS), > as the recipients of ATOCA alerts are the wide range of > devices connected to the Internet and various private IP > networks, which humans may have "at hand" to get such events, > as well as automatons who may take action based on the > alerts. This implies that the content of the alert contains > some information, which is intended to be consumed by humans, > and some which is intended to be consumed by automatons. > > Ideally, the alerts would contain, or refer to media other > than text media (e.g., audio and/or video). The initial work > in the group is focused on small messages, which may be > mechanically rendered by the device in other forms (text to > speech for example). Future work in the group may investigate > rich media. > > In situations of a major emergency there could be scenarios > where there are multiple alerts generated that may require > that a priority mechanism (defined by alert originator > policy) has to be used. The work on a resource priority > mechanism is out of scope of the initial charter, but may be > revisited at a later date. > > Which devices should get alerts is primarily driven by location. > The first set of recipients that must be catered for are > those within the area identified by the alert originator to > be affected by the emergency event. In many jurisdictions, > there are regulations that define whether recipients/devices > within the affected area have opt-in or opt-out capability, > but the protocols ATOCA will define will include both opt-in > and opt-out mechanisms. The group will explore how to support > both opt-in and opt-out at the level of communication > protocols and/or device behavior. > > Another class of recipients that are in scope of the work are > explicit opt-in subscriptions which ask for alerts for a > specified location, not necessarily the physical location of > the device itself. > An example of such a subscription would be 'send me alerts > for location x' (previously determined as the location of interest). > This work may build on existing IETF GEOPRIV location work. > > There are efforts in other fora on early warning, which will > be considered in this effort. For example, we expect to make > use of the OASIS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) for the > encoding of alerts. OGC, ATIS, TIA, ITU-T, ETSI and 3GPP > also have alert efforts underway, and consultation with these > efforts will be undertaken to avoid unnecessary duplication > of effort and also to avoid unintentional negative impacts on > the networks. Of course, existing protocols for delivering > messages (e.g., SIP) will be the basis for the message > delivery system of this working group. > > The security implications of mechanisms that can send alerts > to billions of devices are profound, but the utility of the > mechanism encourages us to face the problems and solve them. > In addition, the potential performance and congestion impacts > to networks resulting from sending alert information to > billions of devices must be considered and solved if such a > service is implementable. To avoid manual configuration of > servers distributing alerts a discovery mechanism will be specified. > > Milestones > > > TBD Initial document for "Terminology and Framework" document. > A starting point for this work is > draft-norreys-ecrit-authority2individuals-requirements. > > TBD Initial document for conveying alerts in SIP. > A starting point for this work is draft-rosen-sipping-cap > > TBD Initial document for conveying alerts through point to > multipoint methods. > > TBD Initial document for locating the alerting server for a > geographic region. A starting point for this work is > draft-rosen-ecrit-lost-early-warning. > > TBD Initial document addressing security, performance and > congestion issues for alert distribution. > > TBD Initial document for interfacing existing alert > distribution systems. > _______________________________________________ > earlywarning mailing list > earlywarning@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning >
- Re: [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks! Thomson, Martin
- [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks! Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks! DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks! Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks! DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Final Charter Text. Thanks! DRAGE, Keith (Keith)