Re: Atom Link Extensions Use Case

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Fri, 08 June 2012 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F2D11E80C4 for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.745
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.745 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.854, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PKivPxKzSCxb for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A879911E8089 for <atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q58IAN9I024603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:10:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.13.5/Submit) id q58IANbN024602; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:10:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q58IAL2C024595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:10:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jasnell@gmail.com)
Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so715385wib.4 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=qtPGumFYAr/c3NHHMnV49anCE5uSKf2MtPbwLk/8lVs=; b=iZhVHx8DyOd+krXl0/js6i+lBhRz8MzRUxhBk6i6oi9+awXaE9sdg4kf4RnmT9tW4Q VYt3RamZsr2NzOoQOL8J2LZO7xvC7A2wVIfRv6ZrmQr1C209y0Pt9zNDI7qeunOzFpt9 k8eky7jbLw2M1F40mwNH1dIdNW1GAzdzjybUzMMDQDmsxQg9ueQNWjdiN+o/p77DyhP2 o/J9VOJ6hSxw0kbGd7k2QwALkg4I9Ag0fUIOXgUcBk/JFd6gUOQkodML9YNPDlN/mrRp LSRu0u/OQ5skoX1t0KPqiGfRRTldrSH9FIaBJaH7tqyxSdh3zpqUa/iYFxohKFINqDGG 8anw==
Received: by 10.180.101.170 with SMTP id fh10mr2801467wib.0.1339179020810; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.104.12 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABzDd=7JHizhXBf4kikey+ab3uvNvQmSnphOrkcLa1P9EqSrUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABzDd=4pwK3Ao=fGOL4K+vN3po9iwd2QBkmL8OwEw3ZmYvW=Xw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+ZpN27_XfQnedj1v0BgS7G1BLR2Yq5ETkwROLXnCZbSEJLZ5A@mail.gmail.com> <CABzDd=6551L3XoZUx29kyohHGo26LTrbMXSHp2WoUvuY3Nu7uA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+ZpN27hphrjLLjmmP4hU457=DHLrns82armBHsEJJ5dcsbMSQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABzDd=7JHizhXBf4kikey+ab3uvNvQmSnphOrkcLa1P9EqSrUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:10:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbeFg-be3PjN63o7cLunStcez8hOuqU-YvP292oW3pAe0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Atom Link Extensions Use Case
To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Cc: Tim Bray <twbray@google.com>, atom-syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>

For the sake of discussion, I have revitalized the draft...

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-atompub-link-extensions-09.txt

If there is specific feedback regarding any portion, let me know and
I'll make the necessary changes.

- James

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Tim Bray <twbray@google.com> wrote:
>> D'oh, right. So why not
>>
>> <link loc:checksum="3c89ea593c01483fd091" ...other link apparatus... href=""
>> />
>
> Because I'm a helpless idealist? :-)
>
> //Ed