IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02

"Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com> Thu, 11 June 2009 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE7128C17C for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.112
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.112 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.313, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_42=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_47=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MiWMIPzPA3fL for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BD63A6A14 for <atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n5BJhAqs042706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:43:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n5BJhAdo042705; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:43:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from rgminet11.oracle.com (rcsinet11.oracle.com [148.87.113.123]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n5BJh8qe042698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:43:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nikunj.mehta@oracle.com)
Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rgminet11.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n5BJi2tw013868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:44:04 GMT
Received: from abhmt008.oracle.com (abhmt008.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n5BJh9eX000559; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:43:10 GMT
Received: from [10.0.1.195] (/24.130.214.77) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:43:03 -0700
From: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
To: jasnell@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <477525907-1244658553-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-228592719-@bxe1007.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02
X-Priority: Normal
References: <20090610003357.59F6B3A6916@core3.amsl.com> <7D3F8024-3112-4D6B-B0C8-79A7654CB7B7@oracle.com> <4A2FF3AF.3070803@gmail.com><D53B6C71-E1D4-41D4-8049-7967C0984258@oracle.com> <477525907-1244658553-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-228592719-@bxe1007.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Message-Id: <33554C6B-3EC8-4699-AB00-8422B7250C2E@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:41:41 -0700
Cc: atom-syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-Source-IP: abhmt008.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090205.4A315E48.0249:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>

On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:29 AM, jasnell@gmail.com wrote:

> Yes, the issue did exist before given that the linked atom feed  
> could easily have multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id  
> value as allowed by rfc4287. It is a simple matter to answer whether  
> there can be multiple distict child sets or a single logical child  
> set and to answer whether membership in that set is based on  
> instance or identity.
>

I see what you are saying. Perhaps we can just follow RFC4287 and say  
that the entry with the latest atom:updated wins. In that sense,  
membership in the logical child set is based on instance. [1]

> - James
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
>
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:15:04
> To: James M Snell<jasnell@gmail.com>
> Cc: atom-syntax Syntax<atom-syntax@imc.org>
> Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom- 
> hierarchy-02
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 10:55 AM, James M Snell wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the changes. Another issue that needs to be looked at
>> (which existing in the previous version of the draft as well)
>
> This issue did not exist in the previous draft since only one link
> with @rel value down and @type application/atom+xml was possible.
>
>> is how a processor can reconstruct the logical set of children for
>> an entry... that is, for instance, if the set of child entries
>> contains multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value,
>> are those viewed as separate children or is only the entry with the
>> most recent atom:updated value included in the set of children?
>

[1] http://code.google.com/p/atom-ext/issues/detail?id=4

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email