[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9956 <draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-33> for your review

[Greg White <[e-mail]>]

I did a top-to-bottom review of the current 9956 and found one issue.  In the first sentence of section 6.5, I see one instance of "DS" that was not changed to "Diffserv"

Once that is fixed, I approve moving the document forward.

-Greg



On 4/30/26, 2:16 PM, "Megan Ferguson" <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:


Gorry and Thomas,


Thank you for your replies. We have updated the AUTH48 status page of this document to reflect your approvals. We will await approvals from each listed party prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.


The AUTH48 status page is available here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9956 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9956>


The AUTH48 cluster information is available here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C350 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C350>


Thank you.


Megan Feguson
RFC Production Center


> On Apr 29, 2026, at 1:32 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
> On 27/04/2026 20:00, Megan Ferguson wrote:
>> AD/Gorry - Just a reminder to please review/approve the updates to Section 7.2 (described in response to Question #21 below) viewable in the following diff(s):
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9956-auth48diff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9956-auth48diff.html>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9956-auth48rfcdiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9956-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by side)
>> ---
> 
> I confirm I have re-read the new Sect 7.2, and this reads OK to me,
> 
> Gorry
> 
>