IETF Logo Mail Archive

[auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9915 <draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis-12> for your review

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 17 December 2025 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793849B8F839; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:50:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SfWXUMQz-sMz; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:50:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642D79B8F827; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:50:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF8D389B6; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:50:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id aC3IBT6WyGZU; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:50:05 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1765932605; bh=hrv+P+y0VCTUodIH0tmsmrg4gq7UUN8Publ+EzgZIgA=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=DUGighihWCbwZfLwGkHiuU8PNMFOt3juRAgfJ1uSdAqeWBRXgWZySwegaL0FZ3/rv yyOOtbuxV5B6e9p0sxZ3iZHfcKsObHIW5+LMvOANz7to3j9shAW//Z17Ph3lsgQyHY ysWTIilhxmqIhOEmWcFCQUQhOizOKJ7xfZonN0IVkZ3NRciPdSl9ODSYJ0M9SGDTt7 U4tCp1Odf7WOD+IwWqMeMrY0bYtjVMy2VBG+9l++ajQdcR4DeGmcjuV/T0BDuJ620U J5HQc7zUtOgHCrgxaYbNWwLGskmtrWhaLieDyghkn1m1On7K0dZ0doKc5U1hIOV05E e1vP7SdHORP7g==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAB5389B5; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:50:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848961A5; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:50:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52A2DA8A-517D-4591-B4EC-5FA39773A132@gmail.com>
References: <30163.1765923584@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <52A2DA8A-517D-4591-B4EC-5FA39773A132@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; Emacs 30.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:50:05 -0500
Message-ID: <11609.1765932605@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: FX5QYFNU3LWGOVM7SQKOSHOHPGWVGBGR
X-Message-ID-Hash: FX5QYFNU3LWGOVM7SQKOSHOHPGWVGBGR
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@staff.rfc-editor.org>, Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, dhc-ads@ietf.org, Editor RFC <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com, shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn, tim@qacafe.com, Suresh Krishnan <sureshk@cisco.com>, Shawn Zandi via auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9915 <draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis-12> for your review
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/642Y0-eXsSyvi2MrHwjE5axEDBc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:auth48archive-owner@rfc-editor.org>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-join@rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-leave@rfc-editor.org>

Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com> wrote:
> I still liked my version better.

Let's do your version then.
I don't feel strongly about this.

    >>> If the client has not detected having moved to a new link but detects
    >>> a significant change regarding the prefixes available on the link,
    >>> the client SHOULD initiate one of the Renew/Reply, Confirm/Reply or
    >>> Information-request/Reply exchanges.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status