[auth48] Re: [AD] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer) in XML/GitHub
Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us> Mon, 29 June 2026 16:27 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A9B109FE1AB for <auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1782750424; bh=HYjdvC1zg67MdQieAXk//EXtBeNGrmSLLN8QtTCSy1w=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=LO8d9QEqHa1t3VXEQBZeojML3CnzUOnJmksBrDjGhAAHe3ZgS7VmHeKPjSyNSLoKl 2IX9o87uuOXI9VepwrNfQhrdDz8u7M5zT0ghTp15II8dqixkKjHPKXr+9hSifUb7vt YBxGK+ytQkR3veygUU97B4n1y7dcIm5elMwGVIzc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hxr-us.20251104.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YaxAybxD0HvE for <auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf34.google.com (mail-qv1-xf34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5C01109FDF74 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf34.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8ee6912d86dso14338866d6.1 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr-us.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1782750317; x=1783355117; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PXTnbhiQUQmoAfPZBAuAJMrc9obds6CQn7flt6Vfrm4=; b=N3lBJg7oKkFu0fLOSmQ6uCYzUvg7M+hKjvr38z0KBxJrq7JMmIZ77YQntn0Tqntfsm jmVb8XtqYIylNqzAv4BmfU4NDvNQzmswzbf7DyZBoFz4qzBZ5jyIKGlfOXIw4hG4PGZm 90pp58rvaprIVXsVYZgBKfSRMLIOAOMciiAfna2qGxvKVVsb67UjgwQu06wDiIsSMCti RSXGtizKQa3lRYQ/jqMRMXWWyTKokpDDgOtau2OfivJ1fkFkY7eQ4tjWRs514vuKlbcx AESvcbOdQ/KxcWIGsdGPWqc9X9RrQ6wdVJjxCyJN5dFb+QvDC/pPiyQeizQpK0Eu/vUn ZREA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1782750317; x=1783355117; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=PXTnbhiQUQmoAfPZBAuAJMrc9obds6CQn7flt6Vfrm4=; b=Ew91Z7MTWq1m5Of1JGiJeUEF12EVoVGYbECAjyxT4beFNlr99O67Ry0HOheq9I2CSd KpIzB6PtWX2JLZOHiqZ/uRvOvWbBsLNKeNv9scwwnZ+kFadikfUgP9mqLx41C6H/05kR apZynr16GPlxlQgl9uDJQkB24LIl1B4rx29GbRLpQ/3BYxr0L8KljAcvW9rRSb84SAKD PKXrT02aat2QmVpa0Gx9O9XPntRylR/eOuWRzCHzDaeONiBaW+ahPPxJmuW8SKu46yIY bLdexUOThW72901bRwbPF4rRCRzuM4DT6UBueofCNRT3j9RFtEShic+ZkYVrxvSMzCgm bqsA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RoHT/xY4iJi8ujO+N9+/To69MBL5/CR3gyJJkl3yAuyTz/lsjJG6elfaOiV3tkyi0V47hLXkB+NCmrCVkr/@rfc-editor.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwQ+aNpQIorADFHP0WRNy1EgC/Q/jkZWBMXA5H8b7Cj94+UQwLP X5TO3DZmZmofG4Rb/rPysW3mPLe2pSksK7xf694kJwsesJHM5a27lD7OT6YVeprBBkQ=
X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7clIkDA2dHwbabs2zBlGWhsLrMO8HQHvSuoClu/wTQPnb5nQaCTOCoAmBgeFAaV 87sjAe0/scv0kfdjt50aCWzLXEFC2UGG4hO3FnbWTpJvRrJjQUZISBD8lolDbi3jrUZ8L1d+TNj AwcBenWlTwyrfysv1kY7tAzMVm31d1eOcYPoc00LUp4SGw5pnLNG7UOH1GfDP+/XUm6zylVmTdH xD8xtwTfUkeqmN4OuRu2ojZHaps076i4d/PyEMv6ReaM4dhMTEErXxr2eSgDcw6FxMH8M3n0LmU 7c7IPeIW/4s/L1rAfWU7sVcsHRADcTGykGJzYMjMy/VLRkblbhpksrLwzj/4WeyLU/u1+VRLZsO hAcSWQPBRTOzJ1Itahd7uT8w7/mXW2Nq7/R4XuOpV0cj8+w1KOgH0MOgvqT4FKemN/K2L96jGa6 dL4Il1s90ipTpzHuXmHOdqUg/NOwKzcKEKtJQLRQhnfXGnsZZWKx49x6KgIwfLay6kOTTyePI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5b02:b0:8ce:ade5:e8fd with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8e6d7f0b9bamr98727686d6.25.1782750316977; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2600:4040:248d:7b00:ada4:ea71:625b:790? ([2600:4040:248d:7b00:ada4:ea71:625b:790]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-8f1a26f1b34sm2526626d6.3.2026.06.29.09.25.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <232a484c-87a8-4eca-b5f7-e4a3e6fe5211@hxr.us>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 12:25:15 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Sreekanth Narayanan <sknth.n@protonmail.com>, Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@staff.rfc-editor.org>
References: <178157177921.17.5053891013411922502@rfc-editor.org> <d2wVG5-zPYlgE-cKajxa6019ca3WkNmTCnwytQpP4x6r9d3VeJEZOrdd8tsRganwR5kgbQr2eynMO0djoUl9CiTUooCVI2K4UpnKpqvGBa4=@protonmail.com> <3B7F28ED-290F-4B70-9A90-65ADCA2EB3C4@staff.rfc-editor.org> <ojfy7jgjgm2R_gz7pIlUpoVzU_I5CU3zORsM8q44OWl5iuxcQ5zKqpA_t34qwYClAYIrcpr1eg9m1aK9GNlBeXEt08h_Uv9ES-XF4plBXYg=@protonmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us>
In-Reply-To: <ojfy7jgjgm2R_gz7pIlUpoVzU_I5CU3zORsM8q44OWl5iuxcQ5zKqpA_t34qwYClAYIrcpr1eg9m1aK9GNlBeXEt08h_Uv9ES-XF4plBXYg=@protonmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: Q6U7PYWLT5EH7XES6MA4KTDTZ3WJONBC
X-Message-ID-Hash: Q6U7PYWLT5EH7XES6MA4KTDTZ3WJONBC
X-MailFrom: andy@hxr.us
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: kaustubh.ietf@gmail.com, fluffy@iii.ca, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, asap-chairs@ietf.org, art-ads@ietf.org, marc@petit-huguenin.org, eckelcu@cisco.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer) in XML/GitHub
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/6cRc5493vZdaMjStDIbZy2uOr_0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:auth48archive-owner@rfc-editor.org>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-join@rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-leave@rfc-editor.org>
I have reviewed and approve of the change to use "example-". -andy On 28-06-2026 2:24 PM, Sreekanth Narayanan wrote: > Hi Andy & Rebecca, > > I've made changes to the module as needed. > It's now called example-vendor-config and follows the examples shown in other recent RFCs. > > Please review the new suggestion. > > Thanks > Sreekanth > > > On Friday, June 26th, 2026 at 4:06 AM, Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: > >> Hi Andy, >> >> As AD, please review Issue #16 (https://github.com/rfc-editor-drafts/FinalReview-rfc10006/issues/16) and let us know how to proceed. >> >> After other updates are finalized, we will also ask for approval for some changes that are above editorial. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Rebecca VanRheenen >> RFC Production Center >> >> >> >>> On Jun 20, 2026, at 3:48 AM, Sreekanth Narayanan <sknth.n=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rebecca, >>> >>> Thank you for adding me as a collaborator and for all the queries! >>> >>> I've replied to all issues except #29 (Ready for Final review) with my comments. I've closed 4 issues that seem informational and I'm OK with the changes. >>> >>> I've also added comments in the RPC Edits PR where necessary. Please take a look. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Sreekanth >>> >>> On Tuesday, June 16th, 2026 at 6:33 AM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>> >>>> *****IMPORTANT***** >>>> >>>> RFC Author(s): >>>> -------------- >>>> >>>> Your document has now entered Final Review (formerly AUTH48). >>>> >>>> Final Review is being handled in GitHub as part of the GitHub pilot test >>>> (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=rpc-github-phase-0-pilot-test) >>>> >>>> Your document is available for review at: >>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor-drafts/FinalReview-rfc10006 >>>> >>>> Please do the following: >>>> >>>> a) accept your invitations to join the repo as collaborators. We need GitHub >>>> usernames for Kaustubh and Sreekanth in order to send invites. We have already >>>> sent invites to Cullen (author), Andy (AD), Marc (document shepherd), and >>>> Jean (WG chair). We can also send an invite to Gonzalo (WG chair) if a GitHub >>>> username is provided. >>>> >>>> b) see the README for details on the Final Review process: >>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor-drafts/FinalReview-rfc10006/blob/Approved/README.md >>>> >>>> c) review the edits in the RPC-edits pull request: >>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor-drafts/FinalReview-rfc10006/pulls >>>> >>>> Note: The diff in the 'Files Changed' view in the RPC-edits pull request may >>>> be difficult to read because some text was moved and deleted (e.g., removed >>>> Appendix A, switched order of subsections in References section so that >>>> Normative comes before Informative, moved the Acknowledgements section to the >>>> correct location). If you need a cleaner diff, please review the diff files >>>> provided in the README (especially the alt-diff). >>>> >>>> d) address the issues: >>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor-drafts/FinalReview-rfc10006/issues >>>> >>>> Once the content is stable in GitHub, we will provide the updated XML file >>>> and the output files for review and approval. >>>> >>>> You and your coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties >>>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing >>>> your approval. >>>> >>>> Once the document has been reviewed and approved by all of the authors, >>>> it will be published as an RFC. If an author is no longer available, >>>> there are several remedies; see the Unavailable Authors section >>>> (https://authors.ietf.org/rfc-publication-process#unavailable-authors) >>>> >>>> Details on the status of your Final Review are here: >>>> https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc10006/ >>>> >>>> Please let us know if you have any questions. >>>> >>>> Thank you for your cooperation, >>>> >>>> RFC Production Center >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> RFC 10006 (draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer) >>>> >>>> Title : Automatic Peering for SIP Trunks >>>> Author(s) : K. Inamdar, >>>> S. Narayanan, >>>> C. Jennings >>>> WG Chair(s) : Jean Mahoney, Gonzalo Salgueiro >>>> Area Director(s) : Charles Eckel, Andy Newton >>>> >>> >> >>
- [auth48] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft-iet… rfc-editor
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Cullen Fluffy Jennings
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Sreekanth Narayanan
- [auth48] [AD] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 100… Sreekanth Narayanan
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 100… Andy Newton
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Andy Newton
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Andy Newton
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Sreekanth Narayanan
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Andy Newton
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Grzegorz Piotr 0rchel
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Sreekanth Narayanan
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Sreekanth Narayanan
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Sreekanth Narayanan
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] [AD] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Sreekanth Narayanan
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Kaustubh Inamdar
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Cullen Fluffy Jennings
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Andy Newton
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: [AD] Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (… Andy Newton
- [auth48] Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10006 (draft… rfc-editor