Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9325 <draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-11> for your review

Karen Moore <kmoore@amsl.com> Tue, 22 November 2022 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <kmoore@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FFDC14F728; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:41:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xv6FJXdT6Kcl; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3678FC14CE28; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CEF4243E47; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:41:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cIcqEAVn_Pe2; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from amss-mbp.attlocal.net (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:3681:d010:193f:8bd7:1e86:b84a]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A6294243E44; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Karen Moore <kmoore@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR08MB6524C8D9AAAF2B46643619A99C0D9@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:41:39 -0800
Cc: "francesca.palombini@ericsson.com" <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "uta-ads@ietf.org" <uta-ads@ietf.org>, "uta-chairs@ietf.org" <uta-chairs@ietf.org>, "leifj@sunet.se" <leifj@sunet.se>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D97965C3-DEDF-4750-91B9-6BAC88501D36@amsl.com>
References: <20221118195334.3D06C55F7E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <DB9PR08MB65242DE7542344E28F46B2559C099@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <EA184BE8-D1A0-4582-AF30-68035C112D38@amsl.com> <48787804-e87e-86ba-1f5d-590e47dda65f@stpeter.im> <6fd3196e-e929-b45c-d1e4-9a014c80dcfc@stpeter.im> <DB9PR08MB6524C8D9AAAF2B46643619A99C0D9@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
To: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "yaronf.ietf@gmail.com" <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/B_QZF5mzQy4BDZmf79oqz6sdDak>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9325 <draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-11> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:41:44 -0000

Peter and Yaron,

Thanks for your comments.  We have updated our files to reflect the changes outlined in the thread below.

(Please refresh)
The updated XML file is here:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9325.xml

The updated output files are here:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9325.txt
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9325.pdf
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9325.html

This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9325-auth48diff.html

This diff file shows all changes made to date:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9325-diff.html

Please contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form.  We will await approvals from the AD and each author prior to moving forward in the publication process.

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9325

Thank you,

RFC Editor/kc


> On Nov 22, 2022, at 12:35 AM, Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
>  
> +1 for the changes below and on moving the reference tags to RFC numbers where possible.
>  
> Modulo that, I approve publication.
>  
> Thanks a lot for the great work!
>  
> On 21/11/2022, 23:55, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>  
> On 11/21/22 4:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
> > I'll double-check the files now.
> 
> I see only three small fixes...
> 
> 3.3.  Compression
> 
> OLD
> 
>     compression-related attacks.  (Note: this recommendation applies to
>     TLS 1.2 only, because compression has been removed from TLS 1.3.)
> 
> NEW
> 
>     compression-related attacks.  (This recommendation applies to TLS 1.2
>     only, because compression has been removed from TLS 1.3.)
> 
> Acknowledgements
> 
> OLD
> 
>     The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Ralph Holz,
>     who was a coauthor of RFC 7525, the previous version of this
>     document.
> 
> NEW
> 
>     The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Ralph Holz,
>     who was a coauthor of RFC 7525, the previous version of the TLS
>     recommendations.
> 
> OLD
> 
>     See RFC 7525 for additional acknowledgments for the previous version
>     of this document.
> 
> NEW
> 
>     See RFC 7525 for additional acknowledgments specific to the previous
>     version of the TLS recommendations.
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.