IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9562 <draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-14> for your review

Brad Peabody <brad@peabody.io> Wed, 17 April 2024 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <brad@peabody.io>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F3AC14F75F for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=peabody-io.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xTUMlHfELIgf for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C105C14F6B6 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6ed32341906so297627b3a.1 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=peabody-io.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1713391509; x=1713996309; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=LPWW1tRROJ3uyx/P1S3/BA+/ZlXexZ/bAJmvd5FqllI=; b=WBBbBcYv1UVQyQF3/Sb7LiIt3dnCw9QPRZgjKE927vo/Ssl1Oied/wB4pQx6Md09kz z7kIG+PRa+kc182bdtG1dv4kW1G4EBhW1I9TFmPivlhK+eYoGCgpzKKsKrrWIaw737uO 0EmJsp3ggoAFIYIlsx8qR4EDxZio0B2a7v5nhcsOQubdYopJl+fUoiMZnUYhrSKEv1g8 NmqttJ5dfBzJglHGKlCjke49m/fXpj99EjR+JCJO5oKZ9QjK309mrmatLX8zSxffqtym T/7gR+TH9qyzPNCRYSgVR1qb7RfjgWTZUnCsEEhv8BMbSQf7yuVoq6Jcvn+jtAHX3LFZ 6I+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713391509; x=1713996309; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LPWW1tRROJ3uyx/P1S3/BA+/ZlXexZ/bAJmvd5FqllI=; b=q17P9ORtyBVPtX0blJ+tyeXBefNZj0NXi+ipW9eSY6fxwMyU/xu2qjdSm3jFbpQcW6 HZxSsT+Wef3Ix+6FiTGg5rJpJXvqJMYspCS+/BjXMolxru+BcDn3a2nHeX/Z+Ol5n2rr NAUa/HMp+78beLKmiRxZQmIV+OHUhGskAVSvV1KCPfNsSCawIezuN6rMClq+ujMByKZm fRayGJTDWXVrUn4OacFnRrBPltJ2IZDz/EpqHvQFu5fBy+5+D+Yia3jDSxAyY1zZNGBk LveEkhSvYc6dbtw5Bd6WkHNVo4S0rl6ONU5gATGaV2CpiUOEynpExiWQ4mk97bwCrg/8 dXUA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX1HBcOPjJj2U+RYa/Lz2oJn6P8IestXN9MDsMerSKaILwdvSm2CJgYo0TXOimlJ0FThBKpr19jqX+1B6ADKwXDzfldv1prSOA/Ruig
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YySty2P7c4plawGGODLAtvx+AjMVjRAz6o6vbczPlyu82Np9fJK ZGZcxoln10v51AjdNfJs+43Co8Be21+RDfA+FscxxRPHTVR7bG0lpMovtCc2XA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG82f1niVpzqAXkHdUguiOgAkinfsRHbgaZB2paItOTbBfaQagheOdqLOI771FWg7Pb+yQ+zg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:849:b0:6e6:9552:cf33 with SMTP id q9-20020a056a00084900b006e69552cf33mr1066215pfk.31.1713391508170; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2603:8001:7b00:2998:8812:7c7c:1698:2b44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lb3-20020a056a004f0300b006e4432027d1sm155683pfb.142.2024.04.17.15.05.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Brad Peabody <brad@peabody.io>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB502932DD237A84D6AEA2AE04BB0F2@PH0PR11MB5029.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:04:56 -0700
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "pjl7@uw.edu" <pjl7@uw.edu>, "uuidrev-ads@ietf.org" <uuidrev-ads@ietf.org>, "uuidrev-chairs@ietf.org" <uuidrev-chairs@ietf.org>, "superuser@gmail.com" <superuser@gmail.com>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3C5D7103-DEC3-4589-A4BB-5CC9CCBE09B2@peabody.io>
References: <20240412032834.406145BEB90@rfcpa.amsl.com> <PH0PR11MB50296B688595F7253EEFC6A5BB082@PH0PR11MB5029.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <29993.1713362301@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <PH0PR11MB502932DD237A84D6AEA2AE04BB0F2@PH0PR11MB5029.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Kyzer Davis (kydavis)" <kydavis@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/OT8pghVLRzinqb3lw1MxtvDVPMk>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9562 <draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-14> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 22:05:14 -0000

I concur with all of Kyzer’s answers, no objection from me.  (One minor typo is probably obvious but will mention “Var/Var” was intended to mean “Ver/Var” on point 26.)

Best, Brad


> On Apr 17, 2024, at 7:10 AM, Kyzer Davis (kydavis) <kydavis@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> I knew I would miss one. 
> 
> For 17:
> Perhaps A works.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 9:58 AM
> To: Kyzer Davis (kydavis) <kydavis@cisco.com>
> Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; brad@peabody.io; pjl7@uw.edu; uuidrev-ads@ietf.org; uuidrev-chairs@ietf.org; superuser@gmail.com; auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9562 <draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-14> for your review
> 
> 
> Kyzer Davis (kydavis) <kydavis@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 17) <!--[rfced] In the following text, which meaning is correct?
> 
>> Original:
> 
>> After generating the 48 bit fully randomized node value, implementations MUST set the least significant bit of the first octet of the node ID set to 1.
> 
>> Perhaps A (the least significant bit is set to 1):
> 
>> After generating the 48-bit fully randomized node value, implementations MUST set the least significant bit of the first octet of the node ID to 1.
> 
>> Perhaps B (the least significant bit is set to some value for the first octet of the node ID that is set to 1):
> 
>> After generating the 48-bit fully randomized node value, implementations MUST set the least significant bit of the first octet of the node ID set to 1.
>    -->
> 
> I can't see which choice you have made.
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email