Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9526 <draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-27> for your review

Ralf Weber <rweber@akamai.com> Sun, 07 January 2024 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rweber@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BEDC14F5EE; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 03:51:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.806
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Op_EGtztgx40; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 03:51:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FE9BC14F5EB; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 03:51:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.22/8.17.1.22) with ESMTP id 407694ug024415; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 11:51:31 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; s=jan2016.eng; bh=I1AU7ptByx7CTZuH/r 4T5Vuc1ZgWk6TL3lqMk8MTtuw=; b=WUfHZuHyMdTli1D0/U/MPGLihTdh+5dkQb 0uWnrcCe2XiVVlA/IHJa2W1pneRPZW7D94jobdF6uRe4D87uWI9CzVxu89D1vU0S 5GJRcmeYkkvLOzLWKoVS0SH7dUDntE1UoJv3UHItcvi1UegyEZ41ecQCt3l8FERp bDDR4qrPGOG2sUJi4lnGz6zt0cssNK7a2j5hPP5vTsM5NFcvCHN6hYV4UG5teChJ 5M8jvH4eWPV8ncQO9NPwYrVXSgcpgSf/2gPtAV6/FVgL5vxyf6eWsVUyYc5XNxOU q+hqc92axpbXkAnhHKG0rDxw8tNMSxf0loP7rV/pPWKyGocBO2YA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vey18krpj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 07 Jan 2024 11:51:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 4077t5Jk028523; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 06:51:29 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.26]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vf332dv6k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 07 Jan 2024 06:51:29 -0500
Received: from [192.168.42.110] (172.27.118.139) by usma1ex-dag4mb7.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.28; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 06:51:25 -0500
From: Ralf Weber <rweber@akamai.com>
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
CC: daniel.migault@ericsson.com, ralf.weber@nominum.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, v6ops@globis.net, homenet-ads@ietf.org, homenet-chairs@ietf.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, evyncke@cisco.com, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2024 12:51:23 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r6016)
Message-ID: <1B59F651-11C6-4549-B3C4-AF092BE3F986@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231219055706.645EE85416@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <20231219055706.645EE85416@rfcpa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Originating-IP: [172.27.118.139]
X-ClientProxiedBy: ustx2ex-dag4mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.201) To usma1ex-dag4mb7.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.26)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.997,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-01-07_06,2024-01-05_01,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=927 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2401070058
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: tT3EiOKttUGzqCr87rPyOaxo23xTf0pR
X-Proofpoint-GUID: tT3EiOKttUGzqCr87rPyOaxo23xTf0pR
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.997,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-01-07_06,2024-01-05_01,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=902 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2401070058
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/g3LYJA-MHqaCWUCB_Y3u0m3JlwU>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9526 <draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-27> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2024 11:51:49 -0000

Moin!

On 19 Dec 2023, at 6:57, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:

> *****IMPORTANT*****
>
> Updated 2023/12/18
>
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
>
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
>
> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and
> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.

I am ok with the review and the changes proposed by Daniel and Michael.

I approve publication.

Sorry for the late reply that went under in the pre holiday preparations.

So long
-Ralf
---
Ralf Weber