[auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9969 <draft-iab-ai-control-report-02> for your review

[Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]>]

Hi Suresh,

This is a friendly reminder that we await your approval of the content of the document. 

Once we have received your approval of the document’s content, we will move forward with the formatting updates.

For details of the AUTH48 process in kramdown-rfc (including the two-part approval process):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=pilot_test_kramdown_rfc

—Files—

Updated MD file: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969.md

Updated output files:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969.txt

Diff files of the text:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969-diff.html (all changes)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969rfcdiff.html (all changes side by side)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes side by side)

Diff files of the kramdown: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969-md-diff.html (all changes)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969-md-rfcdiff.html (all changes side by side)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969-md-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9969-md-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes side by side)

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9969

Thank you,
Alanna Paloma
RFC Production Center

> On May 5, 2026, at 8:37 AM, Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Thank you for your approval. It has been noted on the AUTH48 status page:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9969
> 
> We will await Suresh’s approval of the content of the document.
> 
> Best regards,
> Alanna Paloma
> RFC Production Center
> 
>> On May 5, 2026, at 1:32 AM, Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Alanna,
>> 
>> Thanks. Approved.
>> 
>> 
>>> On 4 May 2026, at 5:43 pm, Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We have updated the text as follows. Please review and let us know if any further updates are needed.
>>> 
>>> Current:
>>> Embedded preferences were seen to have the advantage of granularity,
>>> and of "traveling with" content as it is produced, when the content
>>> that embeds the preferences is moved from site to site or when it is
>>> stored offline.
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> Please review the document carefully and contact us with any further updates you may have.  Note that we do not make changes once a document is published as an RFC.
>>> 
>>> Once we have received approvals of the content of the document, we will move forward with the formatting updates.
>> `
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>> 
>