[auth48] Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-iab-agews-report-03) in markdown/GitHub
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Tue, 02 June 2026 02:55 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: auth48archive@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from celery-b7c6bc6d6-tc7d6 (unknown [4.156.85.76]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CC8F902144; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 19:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1780368919; bh=8VWA9IVz6IIINYOIdd2YRRceOgMOtjU3eJp70jwwUYU=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date; b=E0lnFclolyjCPHTrc2sHKJj9YFRjaXSZo2hdsJTrL+ft/kWiCRsroHkkIv8LUdX8N /YVOwgh8op4ePcPNrt3t8VMckh5vpHFTqmq10B7gODta1waNEt8V8Lkn4QeMbCkFHz X9PS5X/zXN9mknZk7WPpeE8gGD9CFvgOQld5cKNk=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
To: mnot@mnot.net, mt@lowentropy.net
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 02:55:19 -0000
message-id: <178036891906.17.3440678861876565583@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID-Hash: CLFJ26IUV67BFWHUNAQY6E2DGSC766WD
X-Message-ID-Hash: CLFJ26IUV67BFWHUNAQY6E2DGSC766WD
X-MailFrom: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, iab@iab.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, dd@dhruvdhody.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [auth48] Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-iab-agews-report-03) in markdown/GitHub
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/gFSlhCal63J9pieqSMI1fNI_J1E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:auth48archive-owner@rfc-editor.org>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-join@rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:auth48archive-leave@rfc-editor.org>
*****IMPORTANT***** RFC Author(s): -------------- Your document has now entered Final Review (previously AUTH48). The document was edited in kramdown-rfc as part of the RPC pilot test (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=pilot_test_kramdown_rfc) Final Review is being handled in GitHub as part of the GitHub pilot test (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=rpc-github-phase-0-pilot-test) Your document is available for review at: https://github.com/rfc-editor/FinalReview-rfc9998 Please do the following: a) accept your invitations to join the repo as collaborators. b) see the README for details on the Final Review process: https://github.com/rfc-editor/FinalReview-rfc9998/blob/Approved/README.md c) review and resolve the issues: https://github.com/rfc-editor/FinalReview-rfc9998/issues Once the content of the .md file is stable, we will convert it to .xml and provide the .html, .pdf, .txt, and .xml files for review. You and your coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing your approval. Once the document has been reviewed and approved by all of the authors, it will be published as an RFC. If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/) Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation, RFC Editor -------------------------------------- RFC 9998 (draft-iab-agews-report) Title : Report from the IAB/W3C Workshop on Age-Based Restrictions on Content Access Author(s) : M. Nottingham, M. Thomson WG Chair(s) : Dhruv Dhody Area Director(s) : N/A
- [auth48] Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-iab-… rfc-editor
- [auth48] Re: Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-… Mark Nottingham
- [auth48] Re: Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-… Martin Thomson
- [auth48] Re: Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-… Rebecca VanRheenen
- [auth48] Re: Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-… rfc-editor
- [auth48] Re: Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-… Martin Thomson
- [auth48] Re: Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-… Martin Thomson
- [auth48] Re: Final review: RFC-to-be 9998 (draft-… Rebecca VanRheenen