Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9548 <draft-pkcs12-gost-08> for your review

Karelina Ekaterina <Ekaterina.Karelina@infotecs.ru> Mon, 11 March 2024 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Ekaterina.Karelina@infotecs.ru>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713B0C14F5F8; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=infotecs.ru
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QTvO6TcozgCh; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0.infotecs.ru (mx0.infotecs.ru [91.244.183.115]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AB85C14F5F1; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0.infotecs-nt (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.infotecs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6373310ADC3D; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:09:31 +0300 (MSK)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx0.infotecs.ru 6373310ADC3D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infotecs.ru; s=mx; t=1710184171; bh=aQWFlqVQJEtBrcqY2ehnpewOcfEOewmt1Ps94XsdenA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ULb8t2ulfNGs+Z/IsBdrgap32ciOWje0/VcwPW8IK0kRCOTq/pl0ryVU15k+C7tsW PLMzpbCjew+A92lVXOzUeJOQPCXHw05FWlfRpKZOFDp/ml9k5u+6gD5xglACO6HWGP DQSVO1R+RKV4m7Fph0iye/YDSHpmMF58VsVv2tSg=
Received: from msk-exch-02.infotecs-nt (msk-exch-02.infotecs-nt [10.0.7.192]) by mx0.infotecs-nt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DBB310CF65; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:09:31 +0300 (MSK)
From: Karelina Ekaterina <Ekaterina.Karelina@infotecs.ru>
To: "Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
CC: "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9548 <draft-pkcs12-gost-08> for your review
Thread-Index: AQHaaoZ/dbWSlBGmLkyNVEsi4f2t5bEtQvCAgAW3OgA=
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:09:31 +0000
Message-ID: <e51ef8bb581c4997bdc36c39774f3f35@infotecs.ru>
References: <20240228204117.362041F57D8E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <f1e20b89-3c1b-4010-b1b1-d93cfa1feade@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <f1e20b89-3c1b-4010-b1b1-d93cfa1feade@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: ru-RU, en-US
Content-Language: ru-RU
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.17.0.10]
x-exclaimer-md-config: 208ac3cd-1ed4-4982-a353-bdefac89ac0a
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e51ef8bb581c4997bdc36c39774f3f35infotecsru_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 5
X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean
X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings
X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned
X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, bases: 2024/03/11 18:28:00
X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, bases: 2024/03/11 14:21:00 #24112733
X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/hxUIKM_kvDQGTKpRsP2brqghpFU>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9548 <draft-pkcs12-gost-08> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:09:38 -0000

Ok, no problem

Kate

From: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2024 9:52 AM
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; Karelina Ekaterina <Ekaterina.Karelina@infotecs.ru>
Cc: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9548 <draft-pkcs12-gost-08> for your review


Kate, RPC,

Since this document entered the RFC Editor queue, the independent submissions editor has been in discussions with the IAB and the editorial board about national cryptography.  The following text should be added to the end of Section 1 of this document.

Caution:

This specification is not a standard and does not have IETF community consensus.  It makes use of a cryptographic algorithm that is a national standard for Russia. Neither the IETF nor the IRTF has analyzed that algorithm for suitability for any given application, and it may contain either intended or unintended weaknesses.

Note: this is not a reflection on any particular country and will be equally applied to all national cryptography, nor is it a reflection of any specific cryptographic quality in GOST.

Kate, I apologize for how late in this process this change is being requested, but that was due to the timing of discussions with the IAB and my editorial board.

Eliot
On 28.02.2024 21:41, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

*****IMPORTANT*****



Updated 2024/02/28



RFC Author(s):

--------------



Instructions for Completing AUTH48



Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and

approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.

If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies

available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).



You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties

(e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing

your approval.



Planning your review

---------------------



Please review the following aspects of your document:



*  RFC Editor questions



   Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor

   that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as

   follows:



   <!-- [rfced] ... -->



   These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.



*  Changes submitted by coauthors



   Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your

   coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you

   agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.



*  Content



   Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot

   change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:

   - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)

   - contact information

   - references



*  Copyright notices and legends



   Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in

   RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions

   (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).



*  Semantic markup



   Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of

   content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode>

   and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at

   <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary><https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.



*  Formatted output



   Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the

   formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is

   reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting

   limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.





Submitting changes

------------------



To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all

the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties

include:



   *  your coauthors



   *  rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> (the RPC team)



   *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,

      IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the

      responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).



   *  auth48archive@rfc-editor.org<mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, which is a new archival mailing list

      to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion

      list:



     *  More info:

        https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc



     *  The archive itself:

        https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/



     *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out

        of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).

        If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you

        have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded,

        auth48archive@rfc-editor.org<mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> will be re-added to the CC list and

        its addition will be noted at the top of the message.



You may submit your changes in one of two ways:



An update to the provided XML file

 — OR —

An explicit list of changes in this format



Section # (or indicate Global)



OLD:

old text



NEW:

new text



You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit

list of changes, as either form is sufficient.



We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem

beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text,

and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in

the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.





Approving for publication

--------------------------



To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating

that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,

as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.





Files

-----



The files are available here:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9548.xml

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9548.html

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9548.pdf

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9548.txt



Diff file of the text:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9548-diff.html

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9548-rfcdiff.html (side by side)



Diff of the XML:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9548-xmldiff1.html





Tracking progress

-----------------



The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9548



Please let us know if you have any questions.



Thank you for your cooperation,



RFC Editor



--------------------------------------

RFC9548 (draft-pkcs12-gost-08)



Title            : Generating the Transport Key Containers Using the GOST Algorithms

Author(s)        : E. Karelina, Ed.

WG Chair(s)      :

Area Director(s) :