IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9563 <draft-cuiling-dnsop-sm2-alg-15> for your review

"Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 17 April 2024 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C75DC14F68F; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 02:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FbQY_Hd4IMWy; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 02:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.99] (77-58-144-232.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.58.144.232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81EABC14F5ED; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 02:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------eDbBexYZHmG8518pipCCCDDn"
Message-ID: <e44c59e2-1a78-4c77-ab35-51eb4627b302@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:21:22 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: zhangcuiling <zhangcuiling@cnnic.cn>, rfc-editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, 刘昱琨 <liuyukun@cnnic.cn>, lengfeng <lengfeng@cnnic.cn>, zhaoqi <zhaoqi@cnnic.cn>, hezh <hezh@cnnic.cn>
References: <20240412231307.7B38218F7DEC@rfcpa.amsl.com> <2024041510201970712615@cnnic.cn>
Content-Language: en-US
From: "Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <2024041510201970712615@cnnic.cn>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/x5mRYLAupxtpzJoz-2mY-sW7m6Q>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9563 <draft-cuiling-dnsop-sm2-alg-15> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:21:31 -0000

Hi RFC Editor:

I'll have a point or two to make on this draft RFC before it goes out.  
But right now, just on this one:

On 15.04.2024 04:21, zhangcuiling wrote:
>> 7) <!-- [rfced] We were unable to verify the reference information at these
>> locations, as the sites were timing out.  We will try again later.  Please
>> let us know if there are other URLs that should be used.
>>
>> [GBT-32905-2016]http://www.gmbz.org.cn/upload/2018-07-24/1532401392982079739.pdf
>> [GBT-32918.1-2016]http://www.gmbz.org.cn/upload/2018-07-24/1532401673134070738.pdf
>> [GBT-32918.2-2016]http://www.gmbz.org.cn/upload/2018-07-24/1532401673138056311.pdf
>> -->
>>
Can I request that we consult with Alexis on this to see if we can make 
use of a reference from archive.org as an additional alternative?   I 
can see that archive.org isn't picking it up at the moment, at least.  
I'm guessing that's because the URLs aren't specifically referenced from 
some point.

Regards,

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email