Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks

"Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D253A6C55 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.641
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MKAYFLnNn2Xf for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ukmta3.baesystems.com (ukmta3.baesystems.com [20.133.40.55]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5283A6A17 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,242,1283727600"; d="scan'208";a="89672391"
Received: from unknown (HELO baemasodc004.greenlnk.net) ([10.108.36.11]) by Baemasodc001ir.sharelnk.net with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 10:19:59 +0100
Received: from glkms1102.GREENLNK.NET (glkms1102.greenlnk.net [10.108.36.193]) by baemasodc004.greenlnk.net (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o8R9JwSD032029; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:58 +0100
Received: from GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET ([10.15.184.93]) by glkms1102.GREENLNK.NET with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:58 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:24 +0100
Message-ID: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D03773D11@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
In-Reply-To: <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D013D9AE5390@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks
Thread-Index: ActPjUkjpqFaKgTYR9CtDa9qkLF6EAMupxvgAHdBkQA=
References: <20100907162226.96AA1E06A6@rfc-editor.org><4C87E5EB.5060608@gmail.com> <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D013D9AE5390@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com>
From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
To: "Paul Lambert" <paul@marvell.com>, "Alexandru Petrescu" <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, <autoconf@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2010 09:19:58.0544 (UTC) FILETIME=[27D7B500:01CB5E25]
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 on IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:19:23 -0000

> I'm not unhappy with the draft - but I find it does
> not provide very much guidance or any solutions.

This makes no attempt to provide any solutions. That
work should be starting now.

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************