IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] [avtcore] WGLC for mux-category issue of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12

"Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com> Mon, 03 July 2017 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD9D12FEEB for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 17:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AkPwixmh7QWz for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 17:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A458127601 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 17:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DJP60803; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:50:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 01:50:30 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.25]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 08:50:18 +0800
From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
To: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [avtcore] WGLC for mux-category issue of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12
Thread-Index: AQHS85ZW2dPi4MG5PUypUr7A3hzISQ==
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:50:17 +0000
Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C4CD971@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C4CBF80@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C4CBF80@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.240]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C4CD971nkgeml513mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090204.595994D8.0016, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.25, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: e92e8bc03813e4d580bade7ff07ea0d1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/0yCIUxEOqb9FA9WBFoFWZPEhwDg>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [avtcore] WGLC for mux-category issue of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:50:37 -0000

Hi Folks,

Sorry about the typo. It should be draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-12.

BR,
Rachel

From: avt [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Huangyihong (Rachel)
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 2:05 PM
To: avt@ietf.org
Subject: [AVTCORE] [avtcore] WGLC for mux-category issue of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5282-bis-12

Hi Folks,

As you may notice that there was a discussion for the mux category selection for a=extmap-allow-mixed in draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5282-bis-12. This issue was raised by Magnus when he was doing the shepherd work. See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/BaElJmDlmDtOaAcXKV_Rk5fARgk. This discussion happened after the WGLC and no formal conclusion was made then.

And now the discussion is restarted in IESG review of this draft. The author thinks it should be Normal to cover multiple cases, while some people think it's better to be Identical to make things simple.

So this email is to have a one-week WGLC for this issue and deliver a formal conclusion to IESG:

If you do not agree that "Normal" mux category should be used for a=extmap-allow-mixed, please express it in the mailing list before 8th July.

Thanks.

BR,
Rachel (as the co-chair)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email