Re: [AVTCORE] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io> Tue, 10 May 2016 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <varun@callstats.io>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876AB12D0A0 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=callstats.io
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwcm_jlk80m1 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECE7512D500 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id m64so19951263lfd.1 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=callstats.io; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Czfoi8CySK/6m4gviApV+2gjpBCTKS7IXNgOK29lQEg=; b=LdElJxETnS5PLzNjglvabcLYAD3I8DepaOU11QinWGDBhpJnevzWsWkOp4hYR5f0/J UVQsT4gpMEa1Gn/h0D1naVELGRYrqcVvxjasq6QaKLeHmNvn8H1AHmaV4dt7+a16MPvU OH5nDFN/N7PTXZti9Ybp1FIjmVjWlN8mnEaxk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Czfoi8CySK/6m4gviApV+2gjpBCTKS7IXNgOK29lQEg=; b=lydrytPSw35x7V10CqOKEfA0qpNcjLfAxKU7KORtW4LxoHBB77EEvwIMW/l2hM5/JS syhdZ6mDtEJnFEV9vM4mhSNHyZtcdoZBwmYheP4Bw8aP95bGpUDRPUNrHzMhTjBsc5VN bhnBeS/McTqgWA+VKJaI2/lBZBslQMzrjOJCBbCRH9Yg88x+qtMtxAzin5GAWv/3RITf 2/ld+EEEFGtgurxLulzwxVrCEN+pj0KI70CTvLAEQeQ2SOQtVhFbGHho2yAn6wCYJq/j SK3IE4gdq4002O2wbeqXAuO9pgC7m22dKiH2QmR2bZLVXo4Xbkv23BA2VtFDwOO48gdE NQ+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWHHUwYZbMuoSqF7UC7yMrGDp5tfwAb+EU8oFDAfe1by60mdSr0AX7UEatUdOxWNjnxmEkgMvSy+30t2w==
X-Received: by 10.25.159.194 with SMTP id i185mr17605119lfe.50.1462895727854; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.180.164 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <249B6CE6-805D-4B65-80DE-A8B5280A059B@kuehlewind.net>
References: <20160503120321.7534.26562.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <32C2F93E-9CB9-4645-9C42-320AA8B24ED5@csperkins.org> <2EC09917-2E05-407D-AA7F-38C73B179C4B@kuehlewind.net> <CACHXSv6vggo7KN1HOqQyjbzro6Eq0zGNcfJ9poKnfpBipBn7Vw@mail.gmail.com> <249B6CE6-805D-4B65-80DE-A8B5280A059B@kuehlewind.net>
From: Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 18:55:08 +0300
Message-ID: <CACHXSv5cfXyQFQFa_b0rYFSgnqYPmUDyf3G5LgOpJLDQzwNP-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/3U67P8Sm0q4xQk9vF6gcJPSw3Cs>
Cc: avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_Discuss_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-15=3A_=28with_DISCUSS_and_COMMEN?= =?utf-8?q?T=29?=
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:55:34 -0000

Hi Mirja,


On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
<ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> Hi Varun,
>
> I would say that parts of tsvg-circuit-breaker are so general that they also apply for this doc.
>
> However, in any case my point it that (while congestion control may or may not threat ECN-CE marks similar as loss), circuit breaker MUST NOT do that because only ECN-CE marks without loss clearly shows that everything is working right and there is not need for a circuit breaker to react. That is really important to get right!
>

I am slightly confused by the above statement: is the guidance above
meant for a media sender or media receiver?