[AVTCORE] IETF#91: Guidelines for RTP/RTCP header extension modification by intermediaries - AVTCORE or STRAW?
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 10 November 2014 19:46 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008CC1ACC80 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:46:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TZTGo5-6KgWu for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D72BD1A6F97 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:46:51 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f791c6d00000617b-bf-54611629029b
Received: from ESESSHC017.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 53.67.24955.92611645; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:46:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.163]) by ESESSHC017.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.69]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:46:49 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IETF#91: Guidelines for RTP/RTCP header extension modification by intermediaries - AVTCORE or STRAW?
Thread-Index: Ac/9HuNyznN4q/YgSBikGAXxWYEBGA==
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:46:47 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D4EFBB4@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D4EFBB4ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja6mWGKIwdHL+hYve1ayW2zfsoDJ 4s/uDkYHZo+ds+6yeyxZ8pPJo+PhffYA5igum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujInrJzIVvNGq2HLoJXsD 42zVLkZODgkBE4n+1h+MELaYxIV769m6GLk4hASOMEos33MbylnCKDHpzBqWLkYODjYBC4nu f9ogDSICihKt1z4zgtQwC8xklNjZO40VJCEskC/x7cI0JoiiEomZn1rZIWw9iRW9u8BsFgFV ieOPZzGD2LwCvhLXHn4Aq2cEuuL7qTVgNrOAuMStJ/OZIK4TkFiy5zwzhC0q8fLxP1YIW0li 7eHtLBD1+RJnzx5ghJgpKHFy5hOWCYzCs5CMmoWkbBaSMoi4jsSC3Z/YIGxtiWULXzPD2GcO PGZCFl/AyL6KUbQ4tTgpN93IWC+1KDO5uDg/Ty8vtWQTIzCqDm75rbqD8fIbx0OMAhyMSjy8 Hz7GhwixJpYVV+YeYpTmYFES5114bl6wkEB6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmrxIUYmDk6pBkaDZ4nl ykv2G7N8ao0oahT9Jn6k/eNknp8nFuhbyJYEiLNkdprIfbrauv/Sdwtp/azM+yuEelOc1a/1 F4V/kS5MSznIoX+De5bJTo/TR4vefz2Qk+0V2TazSnzl8U9z1786J/+kv3Sdo8LhByHcfDNM WLnktadt/XZQfnX8nWaz4v61lhlvFZVYijMSDbWYi4oTAVXgjyuLAgAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/44U4mP_b6XUXa0urGPSLKfQCh00
Cc: "Lorenzo Miniero (lorenzo@meetecho.com)" <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
Subject: [AVTCORE] IETF#91: Guidelines for RTP/RTCP header extension modification by intermediaries - AVTCORE or STRAW?
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:46:57 -0000
Hi,
Today, at the AVTCORE session, there was a discussion what/if should be said regarding keeping RTP and RTCP information consistent if modified by intermediaries. It was also discussed whether such things should be described in the AVTCORE topologies draft, or in the STRAW RTCP draft.
Below are links to the latest version of the STRAW RTCP draft, which currently contains the following text:
"As such, it is very important for a B2BUA modifying RTP-related information to also
modify the same information in RTCP packets as well, and in a
coherent way, so that not to confuse any of the peers involved in a
communication."
So, perhaps this is something we could work on?
Below are the RTCP slides for the IETF#91 STRAW session (Wednesday afternoon session II):
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-straw-3.pdf
Note that this issue is currently not in the slides, but we can of course discuss it during the STRAW session.
Regards,
Christer
(STRAW co-chair)
- [AVTCORE] IETF#91: Guidelines for RTP/RTCP header… Christer Holmberg