[AVT] WG Review: Audio/Video Transport Payloads (payload)

Roni Even <Even.roni@huawei.com> Wed, 12 January 2011 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Even.roni@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9F53A69B7 for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:30:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -83.144
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-83.144 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1, URIBL_BLACK=20, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMz4EqiBVfa1 for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6F73A6A62 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LEX00DF9A5QB8@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for avt@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:32:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LEX00CJIA5Q3S@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for avt@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:32:14 +0800 (CST)
Received: from YOUR6108 ([128.107.28.149]) by szxml01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LEX00H27A5KY0@szxml01-in.huawei.com> for avt@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:32:14 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:32:13 +0200
From: Roni Even <Even.roni@huawei.com>
To: avt@ietf.org
Message-id: <004a01cbb287$0b9786c0$22c69440$%roni@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_OHPDpYzEJgDh+qojFKlfVA)"
Content-language: he
Thread-index: AcuyhwfIpPCGdPZfS/CddhJRn8twwQ==
Subject: [AVT] WG Review: Audio/Video Transport Payloads (payload)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:30:07 -0000

FYI, please review and send any comments to iesg@ietf.org

Roni Even

 

A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Real-Time Applications

and Infrastructure Area.  The IESG has not made any determination as yet.

The following draft charter was submitted, and is provided for

informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing

list (iesg at ietf.org) by Tuesday, January 18, 2011.               

 

Audio/Video Transport Payloads (payload)

-------------------------------------------

Current Status: Proposed Working Group

Last modified: 2010-12-03

 

Chairs: TBD

 

Real-Time Applications and Infrastructure Area Directors:

  Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo at ericsson.com>

  Robert Sparks <rjsparks at nostrum.com>

 

Real-Time Applications and Infrastructure Area Advisor:

  Robert Sparks <rjsparks at nostrum.com>

 

Mailing Lists: TBD

 

Description of Working Group:

 

  The PAYLOAD working group is tasked with the specification and 

  maintenance of payload formats for use with the Real-Time Transport 

  Protocol, RTP [RFC3550]. The group will follow the guidelines 

  established in "Guidelines for Writers of RTP Payload Format 

  Specifications" [BCP 36], the "How to Write an RTP Payload Format" 

  (under development) and is responsible for maintaining those 

  guidelines.

 

  This working group will develop RTP payload formats for new media 

  codecs, review and revise existing payload formats to advance those 

  which are useful to Draft Standard or Standard, and declare others 

  Historic.

 

Goals and Milestones:

Dec 2010  Submit RTP Payload Format for MIDI for Proposed Standard

Feb 2011  Submit How to Write an RTP Payload Format for Informational

Feb 2011  Submit RTP Payload Format for MPEG-4 Audio/Visual Streams for 

          Proposed Standard

Mar 2011  Submit RTP Payload Format for EVBR/G.718 for Proposed Standard

Mar 2011  Submit RTP Payload Format for Enhanced Variable Rate 

          Narrowband-Wideband Codec (EVRC-NW) for Proposed Standard

Mar 2011  Submit RTP Payload Format for Bluetooth's SBC audio codec for 

          Proposed Standard

Apr 2011  Submit RTP Payload Format for MPEG2-TS preamble for Proposed 

          Standard

Apr 2011  Submit RTP Payload Format for DV (IEC 61834) Video for 

          Proposed Standard

Apr 2011  Submit RTP Payload Format for the iSAC codec for Proposed 

          Standard

Apr 2011  Submit RTP profile for the carriage of SMPTE 336M data for 

          Proposed Standard

Jun 2011  Submit RTP Payload Format for MVC Video for Proposed Standard