[AVT] SRTP and draft-ietf-avt-tfrc-profile-06.txt

Randell Jesup <rjesup@wgate.com> Fri, 22 September 2006 14:08 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQli7-00033u-JT; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:08:59 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQli5-00032j-O8 for avt@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:08:57 -0400
Received: from pr-66-150-46-254.wgate.com ([66.150.46.254] helo=exchange1.wgate.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQli3-0002XR-Rg for avt@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:08:57 -0400
Received: from jesup.eng.wgate.com ([10.32.2.26]) by exchange1.wgate.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:08:54 -0400
To: avt@ietf.org
From: Randell Jesup <rjesup@wgate.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:08:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <004201c6d5f2$7f62c860$b7c8000a@acmepacket.com> (Hadriel Kaplan's message of "Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:34:52 -0400")
Message-ID: <ybueju4ro22.fsf@jesup.eng.wgate.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
References: <004201c6d5f2$7f62c860$b7c8000a@acmepacket.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2006 14:08:54.0498 (UTC) FILETIME=[A34ADC20:01C6DE50]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Subject: [AVT] SRTP and draft-ietf-avt-tfrc-profile-06.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Randell Jesup <rjesup@wgate.com>
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org

Regarding http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-tfrc-profile-06.txt

Can I make a plea to please define RTP/SAVPFCC when defining RTP/AVPFCC?

This is another instance of the general issue of profile combinatoric
explosion, but until we find a way to allow negotiation of the combinatoric
elements individually, when we define a new dimension for profiles (like
CC, or early feedback) we need to include all the resultant (useful)
profiles, and not have to go back to define them later (like happened with SAVPF).

-- 
Randell Jesup, Worldgate (developers of the Ojo videophone), ex-Amiga OS team
rjesup@wgate.com


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt