[AVT] Re: IESG Review of draft-ietf-avt-mpeg4-simple-07.txt - Discuss Comments

John Lazzaro <lazzaro@CS.Berkeley.EDU> Mon, 07 July 2003 19:34 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10760 for <avt-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:34:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19ZbkR-0006z3-5B for avt-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 15:34:03 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h67JY3dA026834 for avt-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:34:03 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19ZbkQ-0006yC-9D; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 15:34:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Zbjw-0006x2-7B for avt@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 15:33:32 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10714 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:33:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Zbju-0001UI-00 for avt@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 15:33:30 -0400
Received: from snap.cs.berkeley.edu ([128.32.34.209] ident=root) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Zbju-0001UF-00 for avt@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2003 15:33:30 -0400
Received: (from lazzaro@localhost) by snap.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.11.6/8.9.3-ZUUL) id h67JX5t21340 for avt@ietf.org; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 12:33:05 -0700
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 12:33:05 -0700
From: John Lazzaro <lazzaro@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-Id: <200307071933.h67JX5t21340@snap.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: avt@ietf.org
Subject: [AVT] Re: IESG Review of draft-ietf-avt-mpeg4-simple-07.txt - Discuss Comments
Sender: avt-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

>  jan.vandermeer@philips.com writes:
>
> As far as I understand these constraints do not allow dangerous ECMA
> script constructs, which means there is no need for an ECMA script
> security model in this context. Below I attached the MPEG-4 annex that
> describes the differences.

Do "MPEG-4 scripts" give the script control over audio volume of the  
presentation, in a way that could override the levels manually set
by the human listening to the decoder?  A rogue program that blows
out the speakers of the victim's terminal seems like a security
risk of some sort, although not of the classical kind since data
and CPU and network are not compromised ... if this is an actual
risk, might be worth warning implementors in the Security
Considerations section ...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Lazzaro -- Research Specialist -- CS Division -- EECS -- UC Berkeley
lazzaro [at] cs [dot] berkeley [dot] edu     www.cs.berkeley.edu/~lazzaro
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt