Re: [AVTCORE] Summary of discussion with IESG and call for consensus regarding AES-GCM draft

"Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com> Thu, 05 March 2015 04:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mzanaty@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB871A8ADA for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:01:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m2k-I3EImf-p for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E71D1A1BE9 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:01:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1855; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1425528095; x=1426737695; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=SXuwHjkItY7mS2hk21e3/uRheVk/FVOLcPOKdDIzwf8=; b=YmbrmDSfbkN76/1Q4qdvDD2ONwWIfpRc2q6uRTMSkKOsmmOigBSS4d62 amGyiEk7zBkQqw9jmet+AAQ3IInFWQ9eDnarwRMjqBE+iipP73P2esC26 Y5orarTdbibMia+k9jfdyEnLmnpxsNuMiInQjoQ6kh8JZa0ptmVZ58Roy g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AOBQDn1PdU/4MNJK1agwJSWgTBEgqFcQKBJk0BAQEBAQF8hBABAQQBAQEJEUsRDgICAQg/BxsMCxQRAgQBDQWILw3XVwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEBIsOhG4HhCsFhXSEQIVPiU2BGoMmjyojgjKBPG+BRH8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,344,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="129031713"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2015 04:01:35 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2541Y9U024749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:01:34 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.229]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 22:01:34 -0600
From: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [AVTCORE] Summary of discussion with IESG and call for consensus regarding AES-GCM draft
Thread-Index: AQHQVvkRRJmML5a9zEOsYpFVRGhYIA==
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 04:01:33 +0000
Message-ID: <D11D3E0B.470CF%mzanaty@cisco.com>
References: <54F44F2D.4060803@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <54F44F2D.4060803@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116
x-originating-ip: [64.100.32.216]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <EC6A9E835D42EB449C7C88B2BEA3374E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/CZ_ewP6aaQp9cecONrQM3x7Di2I>
Cc: "draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Summary of discussion with IESG and call for consensus regarding AES-GCM draft
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 04:01:36 -0000

I¹m fine with these proposals. CCM may eventually be needed for some
constrained applications, but there is really no reason to bury it in the
GCM draft, it should live on its own merits in a separate draft if needed.
The GCM options look sufficient.

Mo

On 3/2/15, 6:53 AM, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
wrote:

WG,

Last Thursday Kevin Igoe and I participated in a phone conference with
IESG to discuss the way forward with draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm.

After some discussion the conclusion was the following:

1. Proposal to remove AES-CCM modes from the draft, if clear need arise
a AES-CCM only separate draft can be created. But, that will not be done
without clear motivation for why CCM is needed. So if you think CCM is
required, please step up and comment on this.

2. The AES-GCM draft is proposed to contain the following configurations:

       AEAD_AES_128_GCM     (with 16 byte authentication tag)
       AEAD_AES_128_GCM_64  (with 8 byte authentication tag)
       AEAD_AES_256_GCM     (with 16 byte authentication tag)


If any one in the WG has issues with either of these proposals, please
comment on this no later than 16th of March.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
avt@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt