Re: [AVT] AMR is not free anymore?
Ross Finlayson <finlayson@live.com> Wed, 10 March 2004 03:52 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA15946 for <avt-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 22:52:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0uks-0000er-T8 for avt-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:51:39 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2A3pcXe002480 for avt-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 22:51:38 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0ukI-0000Yz-24; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:51:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0ujg-0000Xd-7x for avt@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:50:24 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA15822 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 22:50:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0ujc-0005wB-00 for avt@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:50:20 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0uig-0005ju-00 for avt@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:49:23 -0500
Received: from ns.live.com ([66.80.62.34]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0uhn-0005Z2-00 for avt@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:48:27 -0500
Received: from ns.live.com (localhost.live.com [127.0.0.1]) by ns.live.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2A3mRs5055818 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:48:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rsf@ns.live.com)
Received: (from rsf@localhost) by ns.live.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i2A3mRwO055817; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:48:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rsf)
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.1.20040309194348.02782730@localhost>
X-Sender: rsf@localhost (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:48:15 -0800
To: avt@ietf.org
From: Ross Finlayson <finlayson@live.com>
Subject: Re: [AVT] AMR is not free anymore?
In-Reply-To: <20040309075853.85538.qmail@web40911.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20040309075853.85538.qmail@web40911.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: avt-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
At 11:58 PM 3/8/04, Raoul Mallart wrote: >Was anybody aware that a licencing system has been put in place for AMR >(RFC 3267) ? Just so there's no confusion: This licensing system applies to the use of AMR *encoders* or *decoders* - not to the use of RFC 3267, which describes merely how (already-encoded) AMR frames are transported using RTP. There is no Intellectual Property Notice attached to RFC 3267, and (AFAIK) noone is claiming that RFC 3267 infringes upon any patents. Ross Finlayson LIVE.COM <http://www.live.com/> _______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
- [AVT] AMR is not free anymore? Raoul Mallart
- Re: [AVT] AMR is not free anymore? Greg Herlein
- Re: [AVT] AMR is not free anymore? Ross Finlayson
- Re: [AVT] AMR is not free anymore? Magnus Westerlund