Re: [AVT] RTP MIDI ...

On Monday, Sep 1, 2003, at 03:34 Europe/London, John Lazzaro wrote:
> 	Just a quick note to let everyone know that progress on RTP
> MIDI continues, the last few months have been spent recoding sfront to
> be compliant with the I-D, and finding and fixing (thankfully small)
> payload format errors in the process.
>
> 	I estimate sometime in September new normative and guideline
> I-Ds would be ready that reflect these changes.  I would anticipate a
> release of those I-Ds, followed by WG discussion, and if there are no
> outstanding issues, a minor refresh that would be the Last Call I-Ds.
>
> 	This posting concerns I-D renaming.  I posted a request
> pre-Vienna for WG status for the non-normative coding guidelines I-D,
> and to my knowledge there were no objections.  This re-badging would
> also be a good time to rename the normative I-D, since its current
> name uses the now-obsolete "mwpp".
>
> 	So, I propose these names for the two WG Item I-Ds:
>
>           draft-ietf-avt-rtp-midi-format-00.txt
>           draft-ietf-avt-rtp-midi-guidelines-00.txt
>
> 	Any comments or concerns?  The goal would be to keep these two
> documents in lockstep throughout the remainder of the process.  If I
> understand the new procedures correctly, internet-drafts@ietf.org
> needs an official heads-up from the chairs for new WG Item I-D names,
> thus this early email on the topic.

There was a hum in Vienna to accept the guidelines draft, but decisions 
such as this need to be confirmed on the mailing list. Accordingly, I 
now wish to ask if there are any objections to accepting the guidelines 
draft as an AVT work item?

The payload format itself is already a work item, I see no problem with 
renaming the draft to reflect the new title.

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt