Re: [AVTCORE] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-westerlund-avtcore-rtp-topologies-update-01.txt

["Roni Even" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Magnus,
I read the draft so to answer the questions

1. I think the document need also to discuss the SDES behavior (CNAME must
be forwarded to support the CSRC) specified in 7.2 and 7.3 of RFC 3550 for
the different topologies (we had recently a discussion about using SDES
messages). 
2. I did not fully understand the SSRC behavior for source projecting
middlebox and how it is different from the topologies in 3.5.

In general the document is good starting point, the SSRC issues are
discussed but need more review. 
I have some other comments but they are more topology specific.

Roni Even
As individual


-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Magnus
Westerlund
Sent: 15 October, 2012 4:24 PM
To: IETF AVTCore WG
Subject: [AVTCORE] Fwd: I-D Action:
draft-westerlund-avtcore-rtp-topologies-update-01.txt

WG,

As individual

We have submitted two versions of this draft. The 00 is an XML2RFC generated
version from the text present in RFC 5117. The 01 version is a first update.
This focus on the RTP topologies present in the draft. The text is kind of
rough, so I would suggest that you focus on the questions:

- Are this the topologies the document should describe? Missing, redundant
etc.
- What do you think a topology discussion should contain. There will be
variations over the different topologies in this document.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund