IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVT] Audio levels anyone?

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Wed, 23 June 2010 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BA63A686E for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.699, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6CDNUJ1kpHXc for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stewe.org (stewe.org [85.214.122.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAB23A6359 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (unverified [24.5.132.232]) by stewe.org (SurgeMail 3.9e) with ESMTP id 697321-1743317 for multiple; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:58:00 +0200
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:57:52 -0700
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>, IETF AVT WG <avt@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C8477D10.22529%stewe@stewe.org>
Thread-Topic: [AVT] Audio levels anyone?
Thread-Index: AcsS7NXge5Vu+avDm02QWUS08vPL5Q==
In-Reply-To: <4C220636.3070706@telecomitalia.it>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: 24.5.132.232
X-Authenticated-User: stewe@stewe.org
X-ORBS-Stamp: Your IP (24.5.132.232) was found in the spamhaus database. http://www.spamhaus.net
Subject: Re: [AVT] Audio levels anyone?
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:57:55 -0000

I think that the smart thing to do would be to put the AVT restructure on
hold until the drafts are published, not vice versa :-)
Stephan



On 6.23.2010 06:03 , "Enrico Marocco" <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> the authors of draft-ivov-avt-slic and
> draft-lennox-avt-rtp-audio-level-exthdr would like to get feedback about
> what people want to do with the audio level drafts.
> 
> The drafts were extensively discussed on this mailing list, presented in
> Stockholm and Hiroshima (where people hummed in favor of their adoption
> as WG item) and were then put on hold awaiting for AVT restructure.
> 
> At this point in time working implementations of the proposed extension
> exist and, as far as I know, other implementations have it in their
> roadmap for the near future.
> 
> It does however not make sense for the specs to proceed as individual
> drafts; if you are interested and willing to contribute to their
> refinement, this is a good time to speak up.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email