[AVT] Summary of items to be discussed, draft-wenger-avt-rtp-jvt-00.txt
Stephan Wenger <stewe@cs.tu-berlin.de> Sun, 10 March 2002 02:41 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA24253 for <avt-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:41:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id VAA23252 for avt-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:42:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA23223; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:41:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA23183 for <avt@optimus.ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:41:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (root@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA24243 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:40:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from VAIOStW2.cs.tu-berlin.de (root@kuerbis.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.25.60]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA12283 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 03:30:12 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020310031932.02ad9910@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>
X-Sender: stewe@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 03:28:16 +0100
To: avt@ietf.org
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [AVT] Summary of items to be discussed, draft-wenger-avt-rtp-jvt-00.txt
Sender: avt-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
Folks, Here a few words on how I want to fill my 20 minute time slot. 3 minutes for an introduction to JVT video (general concepts, VCL, vs. NAL, timing, why do we present the draft just now) 3 minutes: concept of Enhanced Reference Picture Selection -- this will likely be new stuff for most of you, and a basic understanding is necessary to participate in the time stamp discussion. 2 minutes on Data Partitioning (necessary for the discussion on Compound Packets / Payload-specific RTP mux scheme) 3 minutes presenting our design choice for the RTP timestamp and the Marker bit The 9 minutes left will likely go completely into the timestamp discussion -- this is the topic where we (the authors) most urgently need the meeting's advice. Please follow the ongoing discussions in this mailing list. If we come to a conclusion re the time stamp, some time is left, and there is a need for it, I would also be more than willing to discuss the Compound packet issue (I hope that this is not controversial, but one never knows...). See you in Minneapolis Regards Stephan _______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
- [AVT] Summary of items to be discussed, draft-wen… Stephan Wenger