Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP Header Extension"
Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com> Mon, 23 November 2020 04:47 UTC
Return-Path: <agouaillard@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA253A1327 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 20:47:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Onz7mrpEHjUQ for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 20:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F71B3A1324 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 20:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id f5so13696183ilj.9 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 20:47:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1+tO2+cSrKMG62RywUbWE+KSVh+Jmp8m+wkAhvGRgF0=; b=FaUJvBpbS+9unAK4JPy7YH+kYjh9KKMToAYLyKBzRJRpoTvJ2q52b31g3uNjlEbLbD oHf/+SeozEg/OO5W5k3Z4UZHJiSK+9UZa//HaYyvd/HljU1Ru28/t0bLeswRZtdXTzkD n/xMar7JlsoOiQOzEKwTW/NFuqI1WW33/hZxT96pqTUy9x/7bjFFmbjHji+gDKGPriu9 z9F5X1ehSETObxi4Eio7abe4TZGOI9NztFhjiP6X8aGGkmrQQXVYYKvxzW6p0SzjhjDC IFFOCllpO9wPt7kY9V5SYVFWCvqwgfd6dPfPryq1Dwx42qV0KPCwOFQt7hUDqUSUlL6p 4oCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1+tO2+cSrKMG62RywUbWE+KSVh+Jmp8m+wkAhvGRgF0=; b=nbfvogAkvfCdzpjQjD+cLDSoO7C++l2MjNPQ4MYuAx2Gof6G4ZySdO4IJ1+UkBYT2q csak59MFhUkzYUKaZUMRyrmWeLHf6n1hD5omiTjlsUS4vAGLtqmR1IuWP722piMoZztw 5TM5SUGxDzAgfzCE76oGhq7FRrVBhbPj92hPubfA4sEsKbKRKxrY5eD9J+lTIRf89uUd IHlfUgDLQfJ1oHuqn21m9giwtO4v0ZEP+iVpMm0sQdL1hT0Dlz4pCldJk+73GNP3kKZV iB34XQMnBGEQo/PCI4JtrpfaC8PmxX8zKm6QjpPnydGdksY9uyCCo9Iq4/dKowplpocj hprg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532OgL/mAesj5A1fQ/zVLtpQ9Wu8IQVsCx0SceJ5ZDARcmr5iMdd ZtP/Yno2kz/wbaVwpx2Bgiu4VD2h5BnOUZ0W2r/AAGLQceOTQA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxS86WdE2x3pZI7rDRMizUDL2oB/XRrQfVfCwJpq2/MZX5ETaoKQXl95+WJCYgG3LQo3fllK3ek7f8AoD45aQ4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:cc45:: with SMTP id t5mr8622619ilq.248.1606106834452; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 20:47:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOW+2dub+pwQY8gv1pU-0ksB1jv2gP8wGiYdrrr-UVm-F+MQzw@mail.gmail.com> <CF8E1990-33E9-47B8-9E50-D02D2C6784BF@stewe.org> <0d07756a-3abb-dfa6-46c6-f7e9d955b6d1@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0d07756a-3abb-dfa6-46c6-f7e9d955b6d1@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:47:03 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq6Mr89bQE5yBR95grxePpSyEUbww0ZGwK+Gc6nbuJJqmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000056c51d05b4bee330"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/VO1089y-2UVJkCcsZsiNIeBEZfg>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP Header Extension"
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 04:47:17 -0000
I also share Stephan's view and concerns. On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:30 AM Sergio Garcia Murillo < sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote: > I share Stephan's view and concerns. > > Best regards > Sergio > > On 22/11/2020 4:45, Stephan Wenger wrote: > > All: > > This is not a hard objection, but I want to inquire if there is anyone out > there who continues to think that frame marking as originally proposed is > still a good idea and will see implementations. The main reason I want to > know is that accepting frame marking as an RFC would imply, per previous WG > agreement, that future video codec payload formats include a (mandatory?) > section on how to map the codepoints in the frame marking draft to the > codec in question. That’s non-trivial cost and effort, and chances are > that effort will grow over time as codecs develop beyond what was > mainstream in 2016. > > What triggered my thinking about dumping frame marking are a) webrtc’s > removal of frame marking as a required to implement technology, b) the > decreasing relevance, as I perceive it, of SRTP for which frame marking is > predominantly designed, and c) the myriad of new ideas in the IETF that > skin the secure-SFU cat in different ways (sframe among them, but not the > only one). > > Stephan > > > > > > *From: *avt <avt-bounces@ietf.org> <avt-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of > Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> > *Date: *Saturday, November 21, 2020 at 13:08 > *To: *IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org> <avt@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP Header Extension" > > > > This is an announcement of WG last call on "*Frame Marking RTP Header > Extension*" > > > > The document is available for inspection here: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking > > > > WG Last Call will end on December 6, 2020. > > > > In response, please state one of the following: > > > > * I support advancing "Frame Marking RTP Header Extension" to Proposed > Standard > > * I object to advancing "Frame Marking RTP Header Extension" to Proposed > Standard, due to Issues described below <Issue description or link>. > > > > Bernard Aboba > > For the Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenanceavt@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt > > > _______________________________________________ > Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance > avt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt > -- Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard -
- [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP Header… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP He… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP He… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP He… Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP He… Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP He… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "Frame Marking RTP He… Bernard Aboba