Re: [AVT] draft-kerr-avt-vorbis-rtp-04
Phil Kerr <phil@plus24.com> Wed, 19 January 2005 23:19 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08240 for <avt-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:19:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CrPMs-0002Ox-I1 for avt-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:36:06 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CrP5N-0005vG-HP; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:18:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CrP2P-00045S-56 for avt@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:14:57 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA07443 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:14:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.184]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CrPHu-0002H2-6P for avt@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:30:59 -0500
Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CrP25-0006pO-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:14:37 +0100
Received: from [81.97.253.215] (helo=[192.168.2.30]) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CrP25-0006AQ-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:14:37 +0100
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [265.7.0]); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:17:36 +0000
Message-ID: <41EEEA90.4000202@plus24.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:17:36 +0000
From: Phil Kerr <phil@plus24.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arthur de Castro Callado <arthur@gprt.ufpe.br>
Subject: Re: [AVT] draft-kerr-avt-vorbis-rtp-04
References: <9D277E44D6EF0942B928C6F0DE99BB3164BD0C@lan-ex-01.panasonic.de> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0501191205520.21640@mail.gprt.ufpe.br>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0501191205520.21640@mail.gprt.ufpe.br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:1907b53fda813d7ffa8c75f6e67ef540
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF AVT WG <avt@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: avt-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Arthur, Thanks for this. The example in RFC 3385 is based on Verilog, which is less than ideal for the Vorbis I-D. There is a C example in RFC 3309 which I will have a closer look at. What I will do, if it is best to document in the I-D itself, is to cover the polynomial as well as a C implementation and draw from the two RFC's as a guide. Regards Phil Arthur de Castro Callado wrote: > Hi, > > Can RFC 3385 be considered enough of a reference for CRC32 > implementations, or is it desirable to have (create) another RFC > defining and naming all versions of CRC32 that MAY or SHOULD NOT be > used in future IETF standards? > > Thanks, > Arthur Callado. > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> > I don't know if there is an RFC for CRC32 that you could simply > >> reference (after checking that it conforms to your implementation of >> > course). >> >> Now I know that there is RFC 3385 which carries an example >> implementation in Verilog, sort of awkward unless you're devising >> hardware implementations. >> >> I'd say that SHA-1 is better for any modern software implementation, >> but it's partly a matter of taste and opinion IMHO. >> >> >> Linus Walleij > > > _______________________________________________ > Audio/Video Transport Working Group > avt@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt > _______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
- [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: RE: C… Rey Jose
- [AVT] Re: Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Magnus Westerlund
- [AVT] RE: Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Rey Jose
- [AVT] Re: Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Colin Perkins
- RE: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Rey Jose
- RE: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Rey Jose
- Re: [AVT] draft-kerr-avt-vorbis-rtp-04 Arthur de Castro Callado
- Re: [AVT] draft-kerr-avt-vorbis-rtp-04 Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [AVT] draft-kerr-avt-vorbis-rtp-04 Phil Kerr
- Re: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Colin Perkins
- RE: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Rey Jose
- Re: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Colin Perkins
- RE: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Rey Jose
- Re: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Dave Singer
- RE: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Rey Jose
- RE: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Dave Singer
- Re: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… Colin Perkins
- Re: [AVT] Update (-09) of Timed Tex draft (WAS: R… jan.vandermeer