[AVTCORE] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5764 (4788)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 20 September 2016 21:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B18712BA0F; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5N0jn9z0hc5y; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B0012B9FB; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u8KLvggS055930 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:57:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>, sec-ads@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:57:42 -0500
Message-ID: <E55D9EC6-B3AA-4C64-BA87-26108446788C@nostrum.com>
References: <20160830132557.B863DB80D13@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/YVYdU-JjT4ZQp5U-_mPG4WhG7w8>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5764 (4788)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 21:57:47 -0000
Hi avtcore and security ADs: Does anyone object to this erratum? It seems pretty straightforward (if borderline on the "does this represent the original intent" spectrum.) Thanks! Ben. Forwarded message: > From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> > To: mcgrew@cisco.com, ekr@rtfm.com, ben@nostrum.com, > alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, > keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com, roni.even@mail01.huawei.com > Cc: ekr@rtfm.com, avt@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5764 (4788) > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 06:25:57 -0700 (PDT) > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5764, > "Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Extension to Establish Keys > for the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5764&eid=4788 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> > > Section: 5.3 > > Original Text > ------------- > Section 4.2 says: > which are assigned as shown below. The per-association context > value > is empty. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > which are assigned as shown below. No per-association context > value > is used. > > Notes > ----- > This code is somewhat ambiguous, though the better interpretation is > probably that you should use a zero-length context (arm 2 of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5705#section-4). However, real > implementations do not seem to use the exporter value, so we need to > resolve this in that direction. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5764 (draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-07) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) > Extension to Establish Keys for the Secure Real-time Transport > Protocol (SRTP) > Publication Date : May 2010 > Author(s) : D. McGrew, E. Rescorla > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Audio/Video Transport > Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5764 (47… RFC Errata System
- [AVTCORE] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC576… Ben Campbell
- Re: [AVTCORE] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RF… Stephen Farrell
- [AVTCORE] [Errata Verified] RFC5764 (4788) RFC Errata System