Re: [AVTCORE] Confirmation of consensus: way forward on framemarking

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Wed, 03 February 2021 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4403A1214 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:46:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qqkopzeBqXIK for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:46:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B513A1213 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:46:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id gx20so502305pjb.1 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:46:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=apfDVO55SZyRuwhC2dtO2/kW2X9z97R723ePkYK3t54=; b=gqKbQguhLxcQB0issG1HJ2/3fBtmk86XBYPb3jwj3vODq1D9KNHxgPpLpaKGK1Y3kO qD6TWF5BnnSLKREIROTXrlaCxFtPk5vDB+L+HrZJkl3a+2Rap5IBqHCIOn4nON+xd1pV QcM5N2TJsl9hcYfci2lFMHLDn4cioYM3ciQf2L2UJnvOoGn6Z1feK1S6+kP3JSqgcvdC t85WqlonDg4wyjDqlapSHNIee/7kD37Mqk7eb3Qv9PjBx71NwfNF+00/YYKkSsoEUKsy j8q3tNfUHMBTy4tqAThHWf4U0JzmbKAzJySc9huzwmM09lY0RBJWIAu3Z+ufgyvN1T5a Vwtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=apfDVO55SZyRuwhC2dtO2/kW2X9z97R723ePkYK3t54=; b=YstpNJcuCYfODv7SaFjBosd0/Jfk6ZgYO8DlwJ1UZKYmQMvEYi8+u8WTCEx2RGKs/R wTsgtGb81QkKCoOIFwnuckMTjCWGloOhd8TwgDQ/CknHLm3dRqHHiPNivrPz/5gH+jY8 GgQQKn25uOLaV++AMkjTljhfnQwNRoBlk7Mgb1qMakhCdkY81oHKSfKweEzIuTDjmgAW qh/cnn4k2vyplj+ambYdB0p5tMUu6S09vYdLB2oH/NyeUUff3icru89/O350FfIhC1AR VLwA1inXZlX6aCQ5FfIYY/4WPv3G1NfEgbs0FEW53OxRqceTY+7S9jo/ES/J0kDUKKUX irKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532b0DcKQjuDWJW+ux89iq+sZEV0d8quWSA8vq7XTXPlclZP2+Xd pRXDy1zxEhIkWnjaF4M3yCA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxaWl7drPyIfekfaYiVjNu7LkJkMKiQDE4Kq9NzQzE0sHp90WSC+QV+dQSdC4Qc3FYxHHAYXg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7c88:b029:e1:c7d:c26f with SMTP id y8-20020a1709027c88b02900e10c7dc26fmr4880463pll.36.1612388795060; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:46:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:8054:a2db:a08a:1f04:3acc:dee8? ([2600:380:8054:a2db:a08a:1f04:3acc:dee8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b21sm3317585pfb.45.2021.02.03.13.46.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:46:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:46:32 -0800
Message-Id: <D4F00E3D-3C1B-4053-B963-CD91A9DB0785@gmail.com>
References: <CAKKJt-djFU9aHFYYrZg9vbJeSq+gH0bJsdUEjUSH8DiSvPXhNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan.lennox@8x8.com>, IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-djFU9aHFYYrZg9vbJeSq+gH0bJsdUEjUSH8DiSvPXhNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18D52)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/YfrTn6hyWx75Hw_MtFvbxPWIWuQ>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Confirmation of consensus: way forward on framemarking
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 21:46:37 -0000

On Feb 3, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi, Bernard,
> 
> Was it obvious where that experience would be documented? I THOUGHT it might be in the framemarking draft, but I could be wrong about that.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Spencer

[BA] It is really a VP8 issue, but that RFC is published. So framemarking came to mind. Do you think some other document would be better?