[AVTCORE] [Errata Rejected] RFC3550 (3914)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 06 March 2014 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D428B1A011E; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:15:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BPTL33c0D-Zo; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4041A00AF; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 59A197FC177; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:15:09 -0800 (PST)
To: hani@pexip.com, schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu, casner@acm.org, ronf@bluecoat.com, van@packetdesign.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140306231509.59A197FC177@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:15:09 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/_ApwFOgvDo7h-fn0jW7KPbsVOWQ
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org
Subject: [AVTCORE] [Errata Rejected] RFC3550 (3914)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 23:15:16 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC3550,
"RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3550&eid=3914

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Hani Mustafa <hani@pexip.com>
Date Reported: 2014-03-06
Rejected by: Richard Barnes (IESG)

Section: A.1

Original Text
-------------
      init_seq(s, seq);
      s->max_seq = seq - 1;
      s->probation = MIN_SEQUENTIAL;

Corrected Text
--------------
      init_seq(s, seq);
      s->max_seq = seq == 0 ? seq : seq - 1;
      s->probation = MIN_SEQUENTIAL;

Notes
-----
If the first RTP packet has a sequence number of 0, the logic will cause cycles to increase by 1, which will affect "expected number of received packets" calculations.
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
Submitter requested rejection.

--------------------------------------
RFC3550 (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-new-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications
Publication Date    : July 2003
Author(s)           : H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, V. Jacobson
Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
Source              : Audio/Video Transport
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG