Re: [AVT] Re: [MMUSIC] RE: Draft -04 of Comedia over TLSsubmitted.Ready for WGLC?

Hi,

Yes, we shouldn't create undue delays for other specifications. However 
we shouldn't create unnecissarily many drafts either. However it might 
be best if someone could write a new draft on registering the RTP 
related ones.

TCP/RTP/AVPF
TCP/RTP/SAVP
TCP/RTP/SAVPF
TCP/TLS/RTP/AVP
TCP/TLS/RTP/AVPF

I think all of these should be useful. I will not press my case when it 
comes to TCP/TLS/RTP/SAVP(F).

cheers

Magnus

Jonathan Lennox wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10 2005, "Colin Perkins" wrote to "Jonathan Lennox, Magnus Westerlund, IETF MMUSIC working group, lazzaro Lazzaro" saying:
> 
> 
>>[avt list bcc'd -- discussion on mmusic]
> 
> 
> (And again, since I'm discussing a draft that would presumably be handled in
> avt.)
> 
> 
>>As an additional factor in the discussion, I note that the comedia- 
>>tls draft is normatively referenced by the MRCPv2 spec, which is  
>>nearing completion. I don't want to prevent useful additions to the  
>>comedia-tls draft, but we shouldn't add features with only  
>>theoretical usefulness if doing so will significantly delay a draft  
>>with present needs.
> 
> 
> Oh, yes, definitely -- a definition of 'TCP/TLS/RTP/AVP' should be in a
> separate draft from 'TCP/TLS', just as 'TCP/RTP/AVP' is separate from
> 'TCP'.
> 
> I imagine that AVT would probably be a better home for this latter draft,
> since a) it's extending draft-ietf-avt-rtp-framing-contrans, and b) it's in
> the avt charter.
> 

-- 

Magnus Westerlund

Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt