Re: [AVTCORE] Pre-PubReq review of Cryptex
Justin Uberti <juberti@alphaexplorationco.com> Fri, 05 November 2021 17:37 UTC
Return-Path: <juberti@alphaexplorationco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362323A12CB for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=alphaexplorationco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EXiiRgD5wZBf for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017A23A12CC for <avt@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id l7-20020a0568302b0700b0055ae988dcc8so10951617otv.12 for <avt@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alphaexplorationco.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+uFqvuG+WiJrVOkb2gA+mQyklB8TeCF0rwg7Fb7+HO8=; b=XCwFKw2XDWoWVKVgfWtfIUealLXhaOwIYwfZwTwbV9rTHNGq4FDlIULJpOWbxltfsN QSu8hxDjWtdt6H8iJ4MaYZCsfvKG7agLqLTUNPnrXFxFWi5lC4NP1DNRNPAFZy8jjnlk wfNszHG1gR/fk93VsVKBOkxhIJcfnbxmoqdfIKpbeZEEknBIWojL8X589QzhX3lC5O4+ v87l64hSVYILQv/LWa0B+9pA26LGzKzghTRn5uGF80A+QWtboTEs475nI17qI2zIzOet 2D8frkQ88v0kX5k2QTqX8txliTC9idDiFJHlhghC5g2B+LVMorKVoR7DAMr8ilujaace pyTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+uFqvuG+WiJrVOkb2gA+mQyklB8TeCF0rwg7Fb7+HO8=; b=HrZqHVbyxvYqPffqUS/r3TZnlxJfS+OR7JEoIbMW2W979sJIaTM4Y1/jQflMryV4n5 mq+D+dJJ3XiMjb4xzhRr7d74JPbDABeJH57LIul+83KmKeAhbMp6KJsUmsFKGNU7F2Ix tdmIJ2jPpney10U3q/K/nWlod81yFVLt2ajR6rb8M7IsFMqw+USMfDKUpEkjGsmLcJRO Z7UPxaEqg7mdTRMdtFaUWdBosRjRgWjF22RgPxdAp3cqIKkkRP7Y9l7ipSOOUdreu6jt 9S63CUxrDy2ImwvFMyCrZe3gOO7tG7tHnw/QDcWcPlsyrF1OXtprhXY1J26gDVodne11 K6IQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qDEeSY8wY+zVj6/5548JmAQM0gy354DH3Jnuxt8Qyzm+2s+XP lMgbEst8nvx8Kb4d9DHSGomu1SFp8nI525/CzNOzvQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0aIw4NXsNicxv21sClsTD9Xx5xdNBQuJWtAgQ64gnno4cJEK+DFOJgiNgGSfvw4fBI/eOre1bqVavMC9rDT0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:18d:: with SMTP id q13mr45437100ota.264.1636133832226; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 10:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOW+2dtupsgosFVZFWLbO43=2g_CKUrTty5i1C-9ePtyNmCprA@mail.gmail.com> <27283AB2-1FAB-4AC8-9FFC-6930784DC22C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <27283AB2-1FAB-4AC8-9FFC-6930784DC22C@cisco.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@alphaexplorationco.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 10:37:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOLzse1sw5tMDPcjWwoGVCXrWKta6vA5NABWEk1t+Lb28F-f=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Cullen Jennings <cullenfluffyjennings@gmail.com>, IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>, Justin Uberti <juberti@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e00f1905d00e17c1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/_MeaTI35wsmQTeEaWf9JsQzGYNM>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Pre-PubReq review of Cryptex
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 17:37:19 -0000
There are no known implementations in production, but I am planning on using this technology in production. On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:28 AM Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy= 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > On Nov 4, 2021, at 7:58 AM, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 1. Is there a reason that the specification does not obsolete RFC 6904? > > > This should not deprecate 6904. 6904 remains a thing that some systems use > and it does what it does. I can not imagine why this should deprecate that. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance > avt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt >
- [AVTCORE] Pre-PubReq review of Cryptex Bernard Aboba
- Re: [AVTCORE] Pre-PubReq review of Cryptex Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [AVTCORE] Pre-PubReq review of Cryptex Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [AVTCORE] Pre-PubReq review of Cryptex Justin Uberti
- Re: [AVTCORE] Pre-PubReq review of Cryptex Bernard Aboba