[AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8888 (7894)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 16 April 2024 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2738EC14F69F; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkSroQTiQj7q; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 115AEC14F60C; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id C9F3518FB976; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
To: Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, csp@csperkins.org, varun.singh@iki.fi, mar42@cornell.edu, avtcore-ads@ietf.org, bernard.aboba@gmail.com, jonathan.lennox42@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: harald@alvestrand.no, avt@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240416105009.C9F3518FB976@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:50:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/a4E3e5YfMlRU8r_Al7z4DbiSCOM>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 07:37:45 -0700
Subject: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8888 (7894)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:50:15 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8888,
"RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Feedback for Congestion Control".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7894

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

Section: 3.1

Original Text
-------------
   RTCP Congestion Control Feedback Packets SHOULD include a report
   block for every active SSRC.

Corrected Text
--------------
   RTCP Congestion Control Feedback Packets SHOULD include a report
   block for every SSRC where packets have been received since the
   previous report was generated.

Notes
-----
The term "active" is ambiguous. Discussion on the avtcore mailing list indicates that this is the intended meaning.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC8888 (draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Feedback for Congestion Control
Publication Date    : January 2021
Author(s)           : Z. Sarker, C. Perkins, V. Singh, M. Ramalho
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG